Research Reveals Differences In Presidential Candidates' Twitter Usage
Oct. 11, 2016
SHSU Media Contact: Tricia Sims
|Political science major Kayla Brown, associate professor Heather Evans and major Tiffany Wimberly (from left) have been collecting the tweets of presidential candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton since the summer to analyze the content in terms of gender differences. The results of their findings have been featured by the London School of Economics four times. —Photos by Brian Blalock|
During the second presidential debate on Oct. 9, candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton were asked about Twitter and, specifically, their discipline in using the social media tool.
“Tweeting happens to be a modern form of communication,” Trump said. “I’m not unproud of it, to be honest with you.”
That Twitter would even be a topic of discussion in a presidential debate shows how far it has come since President Barack Obama started using social media as a way to engage with voters in his 2008 presidential campaign.
Eight years later, Twitter has blown up as a powerful tool for politicians to immediately get their messages across to the public and as a way to control, and sometimes fix, their images.
But as politicians turn to the resource, the effect and the messaging is still unquantified, which is why in 2012, Sam Houston State University political science associate professor Heather Evans set out to examine the effect of social media in campaigning.
Evans and one of her classes started researching Twitter involvement with the U.S. House races by following all of the candidates to examine what politicians were saying as they tweeted.
“Other researchers examined Twitter by looking at who was tweeting and how many times they were tweeting; they really didn’t look at the content people were sending,” Evans said. “We decided that year as a research project for students that each student would be responsible for keeping up with five races and coding the tweets that people were sending.”
Findings, in "140 Characters"
Trump and Clinton use Twitter in "completely opposite way(s)"
Clinton tweets more than Trump; Trump's tweets get more attention
Clinton attacks Trump more; Trump attacks "everyone"
Trump focuses on terrorism, immigration and the media; Clinton focuses on both "male" and "female" issues
Clinton's Twitter account is handled largely by her team; Trump plays a larger role in his account
Trump tweets with an Android; his team uses an iPhone
Women candidates attack their opponents more via Twitter, as explained by the "Out Party" hypothesis
With the current presidential election, Evans and two students are continuing this research to see if there is any gender differences in what Clinton and Trump are tweeting. The trio have been working since June to collect tweets from Clinton and Trump and plan to continue the research until election night.
After four months, Evans, junior political science major Kayla Brown and senior political science major Tiffany Wimberly have discovered that Clinton’s campaign uses Twitter in a variety of ways, including tweeting about more political issues than Trump and focusing more on her opponent than he does.
“When I sat down with all this data and ran some basic statistics, the differences automatically popped out,” Evans said. “She is tweeting more than he is. She is attacking him more than he is her; he is attacking everyone, and she is not attacking anyone else except him. They are tweeting in this completely opposite way.”
Evans said she was not surprised by the negativity of Clinton’s tweets.
“Clinton’s attacking nature is explained with the ‘Out Party’ hypothesis. In a book by David Karpf called ‘The Move On Effect,’ he explained how the outside party draws to any type of new media to get a leg up on their opponent,” Evans said. “The underdog attacks more to get people’s attention.”
Evans said many women running for political office use this tactic, whether they are the incumbent or are running for the first time.
“I believe it is because they see themselves as outsiders,” Evans said.
According to Evans, the most unexpected thing that she has found in her research is that neither Clinton nor Trump is tweeting about the issues more.
“I would think that Trump would be copying whatever Clinton is doing,” Evans said. “If she is talking about issues and he wants to be opposing her, he could talk about the same issue in a different way or take a different position. I was surprised by the lack of issue position on his page, compared to her.”
And despite all of the data that shows that Clinton is tweeting more, Trump tends to get more media attention.
“When I tell people that she is tweeting double what he is tweeting, they are all shocked,” Evans said. “They are only hearing about him. He is getting more air time than she is. She is not really getting any.”
|Evans has been examining the tweets of politicians since 2012, when she had her students follow the U.S. House race and code the messages sent by the nominees.|
This could be because Clinton’s Twitter account is handled largely by a team, while Trump has a more active hand in his account.
“Research is showing that if you look at all the tweets he is sending, half of the tweets are from an iPhone and half on them are from an Android,” Evans said. “The tweets coming from the Android are him, and the Android tweets are those that we would define as ‘off-the-cuff,’ 3 a.m. tweets. The iPhone tweets (from his staff) are professional.”
This fall, the team has incorporated an interview treatment into their Twitter research, through which Evans hopes to find out some of the reasons Trump may be acting the way he does.
“We might be able to see if the interviewers are treating him differently, which is leading to why he is being so negative,” Evans said.
Evans said the research results might be different if Trump wasn’t running.
“He is not acting like everybody else,” Evans said. “Whereas other politicians will talk about their policy stances on multiple things that are before Congress, he is very, very different. If you go and look at Marco Rubio, or if you want to go back and grab tweets from John McCain in 2008, their tweets were very different than Trump’s.”
The work may be long and tiring, but Evans said she also finds it amusing and educational for students. It’s also of interest internationally, having been highlighted several times by the London School of Economics.
“I enjoy working with students on these projects because they get to see political science in action,” Evans said. “During my classes, students begin to make connections between what we are reading and what we are seeing on Twitter. In my research project with Tiffany and Kayla, we are pushing the discipline forward regarding the gendered use of Twitter in campaigns.
“It also is really fun research,” Evans said. “I like reading and analyzing the tweets. The students really enjoy it too.”
- END -
This page maintained by SHSU's Communications Office:
Associate Director, Communications: Emily Binetti
Communications Manager: Vacant
Communications Writer: Campbell Atkins
Thomason Building: Suite 102
Please send comments, corrections, news tips to Today@Sam.edu