SECTION 4.8: FACULTY

COMMITTEE MEMBERS

James E. GoodwinChair Associate Dean, College of Arts and Science
Walter BennettExecutive Chair, Professor of Sociology
Douglas KrienkeEditor, Professor of English
Mary Lynn DeShazoProfessor of Chemistry
William HarrellProfessor of Agriculture
Sara HartProfessor of Business Administration
Ann HolderAssociate Professor, Newton Gresham Library
Glen KercherProfessor of Criminal Justice
Dana NicolayAssociate Professor of Dance, Program Coordinator of Dance
Joan ProutyAssociate Professor of Education
Eve StephensStudent
David WhiteAssistant Director, Human Resources

CONTENTS: SECTION 4.8

INTRODUCTION
FINDINGS OF THE FACULTY COMMITTEE
4.8.1 SELECTION OF FACULTY
RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS: SECTION 4.8.1
4.8.2 ACADEMIC AND PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION
   INTRODUCTION
   4.8.2.1 ASSOCIATE
   4.8.2.2 BACCALAUREATE
   RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS: SECTION 4.8.2.2
   4.8.2.3 GRADUATE
   RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS: SECTION 4.8.2.3
   4.8.2.4 DISTANCE LEARNING PROGRAMS/ACTIVITIES
RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS: SECTION 4.8.2.4
4.8.3 PART-TIME FACULTY
RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS: SECTION 4.8.3
4.8.4 GRADUATE TEACHING ASSISTANTS
RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS: SECTION 4.8.4
4.8.5 FACULTY COMPENSATION
RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS: SECTION 4.8.5
4.8.6 ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND PROFESSIONAL SECURITY
RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS: SECTION 4.8.6
   ACADEMIC FREEDOM
   PROFESSIONAL SECURITY
4.8.7 PROFESSIONAL GROWTH
RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS: SECTION 4.8.7
4.8.8 THE ROLE OF THE FACULTY AND ITS COMMITTEES
RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS: SECTION 4.8.8
4.8.9 FACULTY LOADS
RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS: SECTION 4.8.9
4.8.10 CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATION
RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS: SECTION 4.8.10
COMPLIANCE TABLES: SECTIONS 4.8.1-4.8.10
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS: SECTIONS 4.8.1-4.8.10
APPENDICES

INTRODUCTION

Sam Houston State University’s mission statement includes the following commitment:

Excellence in instruction is considered foremost in enhancing the educational process. The university has assembled a community of teaching scholars whose goal is to give meaning to the separate elements of our civilization so that students of all disciplines can analyze, study and organize the diverse elements of knowledge, thereby giving conscious direction to the human mind. (1998-2000Undergraduate Catalogue 92-93)

Faculty from all disciplines are committed to provide optimum learning opportunities for students and at the same time actively engage in research and service activities. The following report, supported by appropriate documentation, clearly demonstrates that the University’s pride in the quality and accomplishments of its faculty is justified, and further, that students attending Sam Houston State University have the opportunity to participate in an excellent educational experience.

FINDINGS OF THE FACULTY COMMITTEE

The following sections report the Faculty Committee’s findings in the ten major areas outlined in Section 4.8 of the SACS Criteria for Accreditation: Selection of Faculty (4.8.1), Academic and Professional Preparation (4.8.2), Part-Time Faculty (4.8.3), Graduate Teaching Assistants (4.8.4), Faculty Compensation (4.8.5), Academic Freedom and Professional Security (4.8.6), Professional Growth (4.8.7), The Role of the Faculty and Its Committees (4.8.8), Faculty Loads (4.8.9), and Criteria and Procedures for Evaluation (4.8.10). The Committee addresses "must" statements from each of the sections and, in the order in which the statements appear in the Criteria, reports on the University’s compliance or noncompliance with these imperatives. Following each series of "must" statements and findings, the Committee makes recommendations and/or offers suggestions, according to the University’s compliance status.

4.8.1 SELECTION OF FACULTY

1. An institution must show that it has an orderly process for recruiting and appointing its faculty. This process will normally involve developing a pool of qualified candidates and interviewing those who appear to be best qualified. Institutions are encouraged to recruit and select faculty whose highest degree is earned from a broad representation of institutions (Criteria 43).

2. Recruitment and appointment procedures must be described in the faculty handbook or other published documents (Criteria 43).

The Faculty Committee determined that the University complies with these imperatives.

Sam Houston State University maintains an orderly process of recruiting and appointing its faculty, which is detailed in Academic Policy Statement 800114, "Academic Instructional Staffing." The detailed Instructional Staffing policy begins with a statement confirming the University’s commitment to Affirmative Action. By policy, staffing procedures themselves begin when position allowance needs are identified in the annual budget request cycle. Once a departmental request to fill a position has been approved—whether soliciting approval for a reallocation of a position resulting from a resignation or retirement, on the one hand, or a new position, on the other—the University initiates recruiting steps. Usually the department chair has sufficient time to conduct the search, and she or he consults the departmental faculty about the instructional needs to be served by the position. (Tables 4.8.1.a and 4.8.1.b.)

Table 4.8.1.a

Search Time: Department Chair/Library Interview Survey

Response to question: "When you receive authorization to hire new faculty, are you given sufficient time to conduct a proper search?"

College

Yes, Always

Yes, Usually

Yes, Sometimes

No

No Search

Arts & Sciences19210
Business Administration22000
Education & Applied Science42111
Criminal Justice11000
Library01000
Total815321

Table 4.8.1.b

Departmental Faculty Involvement in Search:

Department Chair/Library Interview Survey

Response to question: "When a new full-time faculty position is allocated to your program, do you consult the department faculty about the instructional needs to be served by the position?"

College

Yes, Usually (Always)

Yes, Sometimes

No

Arts & Sciences1400
Business Administration400
Education & Applied Science900
Criminal Justice200
Library100
Total3000

The Faculty Survey Questionnaire provides a clear picture regarding faculty confidence in this process: Seventy-four percent of the respondents either agreed or strongly agreed that their departments have adequate processes for recruiting faculty. (Table 4.8.1.c.)

Table 4.8.1.c

Recruiting Processes: Faculty Survey

Survey Statement

Number and Percentage of Respondents1

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neither Disagree nor Agree

Agree

Strongly Agree

Not Applicable or "I do not know"

My department has an adequate process for recruiting faculty.142/192 = 74%121622766610
Within the recruiting process my department develops a pool of qualified applicants147/193 = 76%8152357909
Within the recruiting process my department includes a broad representation of institutions144/193 = 75%10132659859
Within the recruiting process my department invites the best qualified applicants for interviews.146/195 = 75%11122659877
Within the recruiting process my department evaluates oral and written English profi-ciency.115/178 = 65%122031516424

1 Grand Total of Respondents: 202

In addition, a majority of the faculty agreed or strongly agreed that

a. a pool of qualified applicants is developed (76%)

b. the candidate pool includes a broad representation of institutions (75%)

c. the best qualified applicants are invited for interviews (75%)

d. the candidates are evaluated on oral and written English proficiency (65%)

To initiate the official recruitment process, the Department Chair/Coordinator or Library Director completes a Personnel Job Requisition Form, SHSU P-001F. This document indicates the job specification, required academic credentials and experience, and courses to be taught; it invariably includes a short description of the courses as well. In addition, the Department Chair/Library Director prepares a job vacancy announcement, in conjunction with the search committee, which is frequently used for nontenure-track positions and always used for tenure-track positions (Tables 4.8.1.d and 4.8.1.e).

Table 4.8.1.d

Nontenure-Track Full-Time Faculty/Instructor Search:

Department Chair/Library Interview Survey

Response to question: "How often does your department use a search committee when filling a [nontenure-track] full-time faculty position?"

College

Never

Seldom

Occasionally

Frequently

Always

No Search

Arts & Sciences021191
Business Administration110011
Education & Applied Science001152
Criminal Justice100001
Library000010
Total2322165

Table 4.8.1.e

Tenure-Track Full-Time Faculty Search:

Department Chair/Library Interview Survey

Response to question: "How often does your department use a search committee when filling a [tenure-track] full-time faculty position?"

College

Never

Seldom

Occasionally

Frequently

Always

No Search

Arts & Sciences0000140
Business Administration000040
Education & Applied Science000081
Criminal Justice000020
Library000010
Total0000291

After approval by the Dean and Vice President for Academic Affairs, the documents are forwarded to the Human Resources Department for AA/EEO compliance approval by the University Affirmative Action Officer and for posting of the position.

Except in cases of a bona fide emergency, as indicated in Section 8.07 of Academic Policy Statement 800114, a faculty position vacancy will be advertised locally, statewide, and nationally for a period of forty-five days. Generally, positions are advertised for at least one long semester. As a minimum posting requirement, the vacancy notice is placed in the Chronicle of Higher Education or other comparable national journal. The Human Resources Department also lists the notice on its Internet home page and jobs bulletin board, and with the Texas Workforce Commission, which is linked with the Texas Governor’s Job Bank for Texas State Government Jobs. In addition to the aforementioned recruitment sources, the department routinely uses the following sources to publicize program vacancies: state and regional newsletters, minority universities listings, contacts at professional meetings, graduate school listings and contacts, individual letters, Internet job source listings, journals (professional, science, and technical), mailings to associations, national association newsletters, and phone calls. (Table 4.8.1.f.)

Table 4.8.1.f

Vacancy Publicization:

Department Chair/Library Interview Survey

Response to question: "Which of these are routinely used to publicize vacancies in your program?"

 

Arts & Sciences

Business

Education & Applied Science

Criminal Justice

Library

Total

Admin Chronicle7472121
State & Regional Newsletters411107
Minority Universities403007
Contact at Professional Meetings13472026
Graduate School212016
Individual Letter8221013
Internet10441019

Other1

10401015
No Search001001

1 Other: 2 - Technical journals-both electronic & hard copy; 1 - Mailing to National Association; 1 - Mailing to State Universities; 1 - Advertisement in Science Journals;

6 - Professional Journals; 2 - Telephone calls; 2 - National Association Newsletters

Individuals applying for a position are expected to complete an application, furnish official transcripts of all academic work, and provide three letters of reference. Criteria for selection from among the applicants include competitive quality of academic transcripts; recommendations from prior employers; the caliber of previous academic and nonacademic work experience; established record of or potential for research publications or creative activity; and the alignment of the expertise possessed by the applicant with that required of the position. All of these documents and information are used to rank the applicants for the job (Table 4.8.1.g).

Table 4.8.1.g

Search Items:

Department Chair/Library Interview Survey

Response to survey request for "Items routinely included in the selection process of faculty"

College

Transcript

Written

Reference

Scholarly Accomplishment

Other1

No Search

Arts & Sciences13141170
Business Administration44400
Education & Applied Science88811
Criminal Justice12210
Library10100
Total27282691

1 Other: Music Performance Activity; Portfolio of Art Work; Statements of Teaching/ Research Philosophies; Phone Conversations; Theatre Production/ Performance Portfolio; Grants/Publications; Conference Lectures and Campus Visits; Experience in Graduate Programs; Vitae

During the screening and selecting of candidates the department faculty are consulted on tenure track positions and frequently consulted on non-tenure track positions as shown in the Department Chair/Library Interview Survey (Table 4.8.1.h).

Table 4.8.1.h

Faculty Involvement in Search:

Department Chair/Library Interview Survey

Response to survey request: "Indicate the best match of how often you consult or include the faculty when you are engaged in screening and selecting candidates for a full-time faculty position."

A. Nontenure-Track Position

College

Never

Seldom

Occasionally

Frequently

Always

No Search

Arts & Sciences001490
Business Administration010210
Education & Applied Science000171
Criminal Justice000002
Library000010
Total0117183

B. Tenure-Track Position

College

Never

Seldom

Occasionally

Frequently

Always

No Search

Arts & Sciences0000140
Business Administration000040
Education & Applied Science000081
Criminal Justice000020
Library000010
Total0000290

Generally, after a sufficient number of applicants has been secured, the job will be placed in a "hold" status to review applications and interview candidates, prepare a priority list, and make a recommendation of the preferred candidate to the dean. In personal interviews regarding the faculty employment process, three of the four deans indicated that inviting candidates to campus for personal interviews is limited by available travel funds.

After receiving the dean’s recommendation, the Vice President for Academic Affairs confirms AA/EEO compliance in the hiring procedure. Upon favorable recommendation of the Vice President for Academic Affairs and subsequent concurrence of the President, the President sends a written job offer to the recommended candidate. When the President receives a signed response from the prospective faculty member, the position is considered to be filled. The Board of Regents, The Texas State University System, must approve all appointments.

3. It is expected that an institution will employ faculty members whose highest earned degree presented as the credential qualifying the faculty member to teach at the institution is from a regionally accredited institution (Criteria 43).

4. If an institution employs a faculty member whose highest earned degree is from a non-regionally accredited institution within the United States or an institution outside the United States, the institution must show evidence that the faculty member has appropriate academic preparation (Criteria 43-44).

The Faculty Committee found that the University complies with these criteria.

No positions at Sam Houston State University have been filled with a candidate from a non-accredited institution (Table 4.8.1.i), and few positions are filled with candidates from foreign universities.

Table 4.8.1.i

Accreditation of Search Candidates:

Department Chair/Library Interview Survey

Response to question: "Have you filled any full-time faculty positions with a candidate from a non-regionally accredited university, i.e., an institution not subject to a regional accrediting agency?"

College

No

Yes: If so, explain how you verify that faculty has appropriate academic preparation

Arts & Sciences131: Math and Computing Science: Foreign universities of high quality that can be validated by the International Handbook of Universities and The World of Learning1
Business Administration40
Education & Applied Science90
Criminal Justice20
Library10
Total301

1 The International Handbook of Universities and The World of Learning validate the degrees from institutions outside the United States.

Records in the Division of Academic Affairs indicate that new, full-time faculty hired since January 1993 represent a diverse group of teachers and scholars whose highest earned degrees come from a broad representation of institutions. (See Table 4.8.1.j.)

Table 4.8.1.j

Profile of New, Full-Time Faculty Hired Since January 1993

A. Source of Terminal Degrees

Source of Degree

Number

Approximate Percentage of Total

Sam Houston State University33%
Other Texas Universities4338%
AR, LA, OK Universities54%
Nonregional Universities6255%
Total113100%

B. Demographic Profile of New, Full-Time Faculty Hired Since January 1993

Ethnic Background

Male

Female

White5742
Black21
Hispanic51
Asian32
Total6746

5. Institutions must ensure that each faculty member employed is proficient in oral and written communication in the language in which assigned courses will be taught (Criteria 44).

The Committee determined that the University complies with this "must" statement.

Sixty-five percent of faculty members surveyed in the general faculty survey agreed or strongly agreed that job applicants demonstrate appropriate proficiency in oral and written English. Although this response was not as high as expected, Table 4.8.1.k, below, indicates that departments are satisfying the proficiency requirement.

Table 4.8.1.k

English Proficiency of Job Candidates:

Department Chair/Library Interview Survey

Response to question: "Which of the following are routinely used to determine the candidate’s ability to communicate to students?"

College

Inter-view by Chair

Inter-view by Faculty

Oral Presenta-tion

Written Presentation

Teaching Class

Other1

No Search

Arts & Sciences1414111940
Business Administration4440000
Education & Applied Science8883511
Criminal Justice2220000
Library1100000
Total29292541451

1 Other: Conducting Ensemble; Audition in area of performing arts; Public lectures; Meeting with students; Examples of research and publications

As the table reveals, the department chair determines candidates’ ability to communicate through employment interviews, oral and written presentations, class presentations, examinations of research and publications, and evaluations of written letters of application and vitae. Furthermore Academic Policy Statement 871214, "English Language Proficiency for Instructional Personnel," as required by the Texas Legislature, details specific procedures and requirements to ensure that successful candidates possess effective communication skills in the English language.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS: SECTION 4.8.1

Having determined that the University complies with all of the imperatives in this section of the Criteria, the Faculty Committee makes no recommendations. However, the Committee proposes the following suggestions:

The University should study the option for earlier approval of position allowances to begin advertising of vacancies.

The University should evaluate the feasibility of establishing a pool of travel funds to use for bringing a larger number of prospective candidates to campus, and also of creating a teleconferencing facility to improve the candidate phone interview process.

The University should determine whether establishing a Texas Business Travel Account (BTA) will result in state travel discounts and preserve limited travel funds when the institution invites out-of-state faculty candidates for on-campus interviews.

4.8.2 ACADEMIC AND PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION

INTRODUCTION

Section 4.8.2 of the SACS Criteria for Accreditation is a broad area covering academic and professional preparation for four separate categories of faculty: Associate (4.8.2.1), Baccalaureate Faculty (4.8.2.2), Graduate Faculty (4.8.2.3), and Distance Learning Programs/Activities Faculty (4.8.2.4). The comprehensive criterion for this section is that both full-time and part-time faculty comply with the "must" statements for academic and professional preparation outlined in these sections.

1. Both full-time and part-time faculty must meet the following criteria for academic and professional preparation (Criteria 44).

The Faculty Committee determined that the University complies with this comprehensive criterion; evidence for compliance follows in individual sections of this report.

The faculty members of Sam Houston State University are competent and diverse in their academic and professional preparation. Of the tenured or tenure-track full-time faculty employed in 1997-1998, 88.4% held the terminal degree, and 76.2% were tenured. The credentials of all faculty members providing undergraduate and graduate instruction are monitored by the Office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs. The Office of the President maintains records of official transcripts in all faculty personnel files. Official documentation of appropriate professional and work experiences, technical and performance competencies, records of publication, and certifications are maintained in these files.

In presenting its findings in this section, the Faculty Committee addresses "must" statements from each of the categories (and, as appropriate, "should" statements) and reports on the University’s compliance or noncompliance with these imperatives in the order in which the statements appear in the Criteria. Following each series of "must" statements and findings, the Committee makes recommendations and/or offers suggestions, according to the University’s compliance status.

4.8.2.1 ASSOCIATE

This section does not apply to Sam Houston State University.

4.8.2.2 BACCALAUREATE

1. Each full-time and part-time faculty member teaching credit courses leading toward the baccalaureate degree, other than physical education activities courses, must have completed at least 18 graduate semester hours in the teaching discipline and hold at least a master’s degree, or hold the minimum of a master’s degree with a major in the teaching discipline (Criteria 46).

2. In exceptional cases, outstanding professional experience and demonstrated contributions to the teaching discipline may be presented in lieu of formal academic preparation. Such cases must be justified by the institution on an individual basis (Criteria 46).

The Faculty Committee found that Sam Houston State University complies with these "must" statements.

The appropriate departmental chair ensures that each full-time and part-time faculty member teaching credit courses leading toward the baccalaureate degree has completed at least eighteen graduate semester hours in the teaching discipline and holds at least a master’s degree or holds the minimum of a master’s degree with a major in the teaching discipline. Exceptions to this requirement in 1997-1998 included eight faculty members holding bachelor’s degrees who taught kinesiology activity courses and six faculty members holding bachelor’s degrees who taught dance activity courses. Substantially more than 25% of the discipline course hours in the undergraduate major programs are taught by faculty members holding the terminal degree.

The office of the appropriate dean as well as the Office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs also monitors the credentials of all faculty members who provide undergraduate instruction.

Exceptional cases in which faculty do not have a master’s degree with eighteen graduate semester hours but who do have outstanding professional experience and have demonstrated contributions to the teaching discipline are justified when the faculty members are first employed. The records of such exceptions are maintained among the faculty files in the office of the President.

During 1997-1998 there were exceptional cases among faculty teaching Spanish. The employment of these faculty members was justified on the basis of their being native speakers of Spanish, their having outstanding professional experience (such as having taught Spanish in the public schools for more than twenty-five years or having lived many years in Mexico), and/or their having completed two summers of intensive study in Mexico.

From time to time the Elementary Education Program has employed individuals who have responsibilities associated with student teaching; some of these faculty do not have the required graduate hours in elementary education, but do have appropriate compensatory experiences in public schools. One such faculty, for example, taught elementary social studies courses and also supervised elementary education student teachers of social studies. This faculty member, who holds a degree in history, has six years of teaching experience in elementary schools; in addition, he has been employed by the Region VI Education Service Center, where his assignment was to work with teachers and administrators at elementary and secondary school campuses in this region.

3. The Commission encourages interdisciplinary courses and recognizes that appropriate credentials for teaching may vary. The institution must document and justify the academic and professional preparation of faculty members teaching in such courses or programs (Criteria 46).

4. It is the responsibility of the institution to keep on file for all full-time and part-time faculty members documentation of academic preparation, such as official transcripts and, if appropriate for demonstrating competence, official documentation of professional and work experience, technical and performance competency, records of publications, certifications and other qualifications (Criteria 46-47).

The Committee determined that the University complies with these criteria.

The University offers an interdisciplinary degree program in environmental science. The environmental science courses are taught by faculty members who have the appropriate credentials for the courses they teach. These faculty members include faculty from the Departments of Biological Sciences and Chemistry as well as an adjunct faculty member. The academic preparation of the faculty members teaching environmental science courses during 1997-1998 are summarized in Table 4.8.2.2.a:

Table 4.8.2.2.a

Faculty Members Teaching Environmental Science Courses

Departmental Affiliation

Terminal Degree

Major

Biological SciencesPhDBiology and Environmental Engineering
Biological SciencesPhDBacteriology
Biological SciencesPhDZoology
ChemistryPhDAnalytical/Environmental Chemistry
Adjunct Faculty (Industrial Hygienist)MSEnvironmental Science

Documentation of the academic and professional preparation of faculty teaching in this program can be found in the files of the faculty members in the Office of the President. In addition, the chair of the Department of Biological Sciences makes the teaching assignments each semester and monitors the academic preparation of the faculty members teaching in this program.

The University also offers several interdisciplinary courses within its Honors Program. These courses draw upon the expertise of faculty from the Departments of Physics, Geography and Geology, Biological Sciences, Chemistry, History, and Political Science. With the department chairs of these disciplines, the Director of the Honors Program shares responsibility for assuring the appropriateness of faculty credentials to teach in the program.

The interdisciplinary major in humanities is being phased out by the year 2000 because of students’ lack of interest and participation.

5. At least 25 percent of the discipline course hours in each undergraduate major must be taught by faculty members holding the terminal degree, usually the earned doctorate, in that discipline. In some disciplines, the master’s degree in the discipline may be considered the terminal degree, such as the M.F.A., the M.S.W., and the M.L.S.; in others, a master’s degree in the discipline, coupled with a doctoral degree in a related discipline, is considered appropriate (Criteria 47).

6. It is the responsibility of the institution to justify the master’s degree, or master’s in the teaching discipline coupled with a related doctorate, as the terminal degree for faculty members teaching in these disciplines (Criteria 47).

7. The above requirement also applies to each major offered through distance learning, including those offered at branches or other sites (Criteria 47).

The Faculty Committee determined that the University complies with all of these imperatives.

During the fall of 1997 and spring of 1998, the long semesters used as samples, more than the required 25% of the course hours in each major undergraduate discipline were taught by faculty members holding the terminal degree, usually the earned doctorate in the discipline, the master’s degree in the discipline considered to be the terminal degree in the discipline, or the master’s degree in the discipline and a doctoral degree in a related discipline. The percentages of undergraduate major hours taught in the fall of 1997 by faculty with appropriate terminal degrees are indicated in Table 4.8.2.2.b. Results similar to these were also obtained for the Spring 1998 semester.

Table 4.8.2.2.b

Percentage of Undergraduate Hours Taught by Faculty with

Appropriate Terminal Degrees: Fall 1997

Undergraduate Discipline

College

Percentage of Undergraduate Major Credit Hours Taught by Faculty with Earned Doctorate in Discipline, MFA, MSW, MLS, or Master’s Degree in Discipline Coupled with Related Doctorate

 Arts and Sciences 
Art 66.4
Biological Sciences 87.5
Chemistry 76.9
Computing Science 46.3
Dance 53.7
English 56.4
Environmental Science 69.3
French 100.0
Geography 71.3
Geology 100.0
German 100.0
History 82.8
Journalism 32.5
Mathematics 69.4
Music 42.1
Photography 63.1
Physics 76.5
Political Science 100.0
Radio/Television 64.3
Sociology 71.4
Spanish 49.2
Speech Communication 74.7
Theatre 97.8
Statistics (Support Area) 100.0
 Business Administration 
Accounting 57.5
Finance 49.1
General Business Administration 62.4
 Business Administration 
Economics 78.1
Management 71.2
Marketing 49.9
Business Analysis (Support Area) 35.5
Management Information Systems (Support Area) 100.0
 Criminal Justice 
Criminal Justice 87.6
 Education and Applied Science 
Academic Studies 59.3
Agriculture 71.3
Health 91.6
Home Economics 99.1
Technology 74.4
Kinesiology 64.5
Philosophy 100.0
Psychology 66.1
Bilingual/English-as-a-Second Language (Support Area) 98.8

8. Faculty members who teach in remedial programs must hold a baccalaureate degree in a discipline related to their teaching assignment and have either teaching experience in a discipline related to their assignment or graduate training in remedial education (Criteria 47).

The Committee found that the University complies with this "must" statement.

Sam Houston offers four developmental courses: ENG 031D, MTH 031D, MTH 032D, and RDG 031D. All instructors of developmental courses hold at least the bachelor's degree and have either teaching experience in a discipline related to their assignment or graduate training in remedial education. Table 4.8.2.2.c summarizes these course offerings for the academic year 1997-1998:

Table 4.8.2.2.c

Profile of Developmental Courses

A. Developmental Courses Taught During Fall 1997 Semester

Developmental Course

Number of Faculty Members

Number of Sections

ENG 031D812
MTH 031D715
MTH 032D46
RDG 031D48
Total2341

B. Developmental Courses Taught During Spring 1998 Semester

Developmental Course

Number of Faculty Members

Number of Sections

ENG 031D46
MTH 031D59
MTH 032D44
RDG 031D14
Total1423

Developmental English is sometimes taught by graduate assistants who hold bachelor’s degrees in English or, rarely, in a related field. However, during 1997-1998, two of the instructors of ENG 031D held MA degrees in English. In addition, during the fall of 1997, the Director of Freshman English, an Associate Professor of English with impressive experience teaching in her discipline, taught one section of ENG 031D. The director monitors classroom performance of instructors of ENG 031D.

Among the instructors of MTH 031D and MTH 032D during 1997-1998 were the Coordinator of Developmental Mathematics, who holds the MS in mathematics and has extensive teaching experience in that discipline; two faculty members who hold PhD degrees in mathematics; six faculty members who hold MA degrees in mathematics; one faculty member who holds a BS in mathematics and an MEd in Educational Psychology; and two graduate assistants who hold the BS in mathematics. Six of the faculty members teaching the developmental mathematics courses have had extensive experience teaching mathematics at Sam Houston State University.

Developmental Reading is taught by three faculty members who hold MEd degrees in reading and one faculty member who holds the Doctor of Education degree.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS: SECTION 4.8.2.2

Having determined that faculty members of Sam Houston State University who teach in baccalaureate programs meet all the criteria specified for their academic and professional preparation, the Faculty Committee has no recommendations.

4.8.2.3 GRADUATE

Sam Houston State University is authorized by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board to offer seven graduate degrees in seventy-five degree programs and three doctoral degrees in three degree programs. The graduate faculty comprises members of the University academic faculty and administration who have been appointed as either graduate faculty or associate graduate faculty according to established procedures. These faculty are expected to engage in recognized scholarly activities, research, and/or professional activity.

The Vice President for Academic Affairs is responsible for overseeing the academic programs. The Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs is the chief administrative officer of the graduate faculty. The Graduate Council serves as an advisory body to the Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs. The Graduate Council consists of the Coordinator of Graduate Studies, who serves as chair, two faculty members from each college, the Director of the Newton Gresham Library, and the Director of Undergraduate Admissions, who is an ex officio member.

The dean of each college serves as the official representative of the graduate faculty of the college. The dean also serves as the official channel of communication between the graduate students and the University administration.

1. Institutions offering either master’s or specialist degrees must demonstrate a high level of faculty competence in teaching and scholarship (Criteria 47).

The Committee determined that Sam Houston State University complies with this criterion.

Minimum requirements for appointment to the graduate faculty ensure that the graduate faculty demonstrate the requisite commitment, interest, and skills essential for the integrity and effectiveness of graduate education. Graduate faculty who are current in their areas of specialization are involved in the types of scholarly activities (for example, research and writing) required of graduate students in order that they can serve as role models and that they have first-hand experience to guide and direct the scholarly activities of students. Evidence of research and scholarly activities includes presentation of papers at professional conferences, as well as the publication of books, textbooks, book chapters, monographs, research reports, journal articles, book reviews, and review essays. Creative activities and accomplishments include local, state, and national art exhibitions; juried competitions; concerts; recitals; dance spectrums; and theatrical performances.

The academic or professional community recognizes a faculty member for his or her scholarly expertise in the field. This recognition is indicated by appointment to important planning committees; election or appointment to administrative positions of national professional associations; receipt of awards or honors from professional, academic, scientific, or governmental agencies; and appointment to the editorial and review boards of academic journals, book publishers, and governmental agencies.

2. Institutions offering doctoral degrees must demonstrate the research capability of faculty members teaching in these programs (Criteria 47).

The Faculty Committee determined that Sam Houston State University complies with this criterion.

The University demonstrates the research contributions of faculty members of each college, including faculty who teach in the doctoral programs, in its publication of the Annual Report on Faculty Research and Creative Accomplishments. This document lists publications; book/media reviews; conference papers; creative accomplishments; school district activities; and awards, grants, contracts, and research of various faculty members. The Annual Report on Faculty Research and Creative Accomplishments is available to each department chair in hard copy and to each faculty member on the mainframe.

The College of Criminal Justice recognizes scholarly and professional activities, publications, and scholarly recognition as being interrelated. Graduate faculty are expected to show activity in all three areas during their careers. Graduate faculty status is reviewed every two years; faculty accomplishments are evaluated on the same schedule. Graduate faculty are expected to engage regularly in activities, including research, that are essential for a complete graduate education.

3. Eligibility requirements for faculty members teaching graduate courses must be clearly defined and publicized (Criteria 47).

The Committee established that Sam Houston State University complies with this "must" statement.

The graduate faculty consists of those members of the University academic faculty and administration who have been appointed to graduate faculty membership in accord with eligibility requirements and procedures established in Academic Policy Statement 801014. This policy statement in its entirety is accessible on the mainframe, as is the complete Academic Policy Manual. Hard copies of the Academic Policy Manual are also located in the offices of the academic deans, department chairs, and the Newton Gresham Library. This academic policy statement is also accessible in Appendix V of The Faculty Handbook issued to each faculty member, as are other academic policy statements from the faculty section of the Academic Policy Manual.

The following statements in Academic Policy Statement 801014 refer to the eligibility requirements for graduate faculty:

Nomination and approval of nominees to the graduate faculty will be based upon evidence of competencies which shall be judged to be essential to successful performance at the graduate level. Each academic department chair will provide to the appropriate college dean a list of the recommended minimum requirements for appointment of a faculty member of that academic unit to the graduate faculty. Each college dean will, in turn, develop a statement outlining the minimum requirements for the appointment of a faculty member of that college to the graduate faculty. The University Graduate Council will review all of the recommended minimum appointment criteria submitted by each college in order to ensure a modicum of standardization of appointment requirements across the University. The University Graduate Council will forward the results of its review, together with any recommendations for change deemed appropriate, to the Vice President for Academic Affairs. Upon approval of the proposed appointment criteria for each college by the Vice President for Academic Affairs, current and future graduate faculty appointments will be evaluated according to the criteria established for the appropriate college in order to determine appointment eligibility.

Criteria for membership on the graduate/associate graduate faculty were established for each of the colleges according to the procedure outlined above. Copies of these criteria are available from the offices of the appropriate department chairs, the college deans, the Coordinator of Graduate Studies, and the Vice President for Academic Affairs.

4. All institutions must have adequate resources to attract and retain a qualified faculty, especially in the disciplines in which doctoral programs are offered (Criteria 47).

The Faculty Committee determined that the University complies with this criterion.

The interim dean of the criminal justice doctoral program indicated that even though salaries at Sam Houston State University are a little less overall than they are nationally, the salaries are adequate to attract and retain a qualified faculty. This administrator also indicated that support systems are adequate. These resources include computer equipment, computer laboratories, secretarial support, and faculty offices. There are no research assistantships for graduate students, but there are teaching assistantships reserved for the more advanced doctoral students.

The Dean of the College of Education and Applied Science, who oversees the Educational Leadership doctoral program, indicated that steps have been taken through market adjustments and merit pay (both of which are required for doctoral faculty) to adjust any salary inequities.

5. Faculty members responsible for the direction of doctoral research must be experienced in directing independent study (Criteria 47).

The Faculty Committee found that the University complies with this criterion.

All graduate faculty members responsible for the direction of doctoral research are experienced in directing independent study. Prior to and periodically during employment, each graduate faculty member has submitted a vitae that summarizes professional and work experiences, technical and performance competencies, publications, certifications, and service activities. Appropriate documentation of doctoral faculty credentials is maintained in the office of the appropriate dean and the Office of the President.

6. Each faculty member teaching courses at the master’s and specialist degree level must hold the terminal degree, usually the earned doctorate, in the teaching discipline or a related discipline. In some instances, the master’s degree in the discipline may be considered the terminal degree, such as the M.F.A., the M.S.W., and the M.L.S.; in others, a master’s degree in the discipline coupled with a doctoral degree in a related discipline is considered appropriate (Criteria 48).

7. It is the responsibility of the institution to justify the master’s degree, or master’s in the teaching discipline coupled with a related doctorate, as the terminal degree for faculty members teaching in those disciplines (Criteria 48).

The Committee determined that Sam Houston State University complies with these imperatives.

In most instances faculty members teaching courses at the master’s and specialist degree level hold the terminal degree in the teaching discipline or a related discipline. However, during the fall of 1997 and the spring of 1998, there were exceptions to this practice. These exceptions included two faculty members in the Computing Science Program who taught three graduate courses. Both faculty members held the MS degree in Computing Science, and one of these faculty members had completed sixty-seven doctoral graduate hours in computing science. In another example, a faculty member with an MA degree in history and sixty-two doctoral hours of history taught two sections of a master’s level history course by independent study. One faculty member with an MEd degree taught one section of a special education course, while another faculty member with an MEd degree taught one section of an industrial technology course. In each case the faculty had demonstrated exceptional scholarly and/or professional experience.

The Department of Music has many specialized courses that require instructors to teach a limited number of students. Eight of these instructors holding either the MM or MA degree in music taught fifteen sections of courses in their specialization. These instructors are distinguished professionals who perform in area orchestras and other musical groups.

The MFA in Art is considered to be the terminal degree for faculty teaching in either the MFA or MA degree programs in that discipline. During the 1997-1998 academic year, four faculty in the Department of Art possessed either the MA or MS degree in Art coupled with the MFA degree, two faculty held the MFA degree, one faculty had the MA degree in Art, and one faculty held the MA in Art coupled with the PhD in College Teaching. Each of the MFA, MA, and MS degrees was in the faculty member’s teaching area.

In the Department of General Business and Finance, one faculty member who taught graduate business administration courses holds the MS in Business Administration and the EdD degree in Curriculum and Instruction.

One faculty in the Department of Health and Kinesiology who holds the MS degree in Nutrition and Food coupled with the PhD in Curriculum and Instruction taught graduate Health Education courses. This faculty member had earned eighteen graduate hours in Health Education for the PhD Another faculty in this department who had the PhD in Physiology taught graduate courses in Kinesiology.

During 1997-1998 graduate courses were taught by faculty in the Department of Library Science who had terminal degrees in related fields. These faculty included two individuals who both hold MEd and EdD degrees in Curriculum and Instruction, one who holds the MLS degree and the PhD in Educational Administration, one who holds the MS in Library Science and the PhD in Educational Administration, and one who holds the MEd degree in Elementary Education and the MLS in Library Science.

In the Mathematics Program, one faculty who holds the MS degree in Mathematics and the Doctor of Education in Curriculum and Instruction taught graduate courses.

The MFA degree is considered to be a terminal degree for faculty who teach in the Dance Program. During 1997-1998 two faculty who hold the MFA in Dance taught graduate dance courses.

One faculty member of the Psychology Program who holds both the MEd and the PhD in Education taught a graduate Psychology course during the 1997 Fall semester.

During 1997-1998 one faculty member of the Department of Technology who holds the MEd degree in Industrial Arts Education and the EdD in College Teaching taught graduate Industrial Education courses. This faculty member has thirty-nine graduate hours in Industrial Arts in his EdD degree courses.

Should an academic department seek permission to have a non-member of the graduate faculty teach a graduate course within a given semester, a formal request, accompanied by documented justification, must be submitted by the department for review and action to the dean and to the Vice President for Academic Affairs (see form entitled "Request for Permission to Allow a Nonmember of the Graduate/Associate Graduate Faculty to Teach a Graduate Course").

8. All faculty members teaching courses at the doctoral degree level must hold the earned doctorate in the teaching discipline or a related discipline (Criteria 48).

The Faculty Committee found that the University complies with this imperative.

Sam Houston State University is authorized to offer the Doctor of Philosophy in Criminal Justice, the Doctor of Education in Educational Leadership, and the Doctor of Philosophy in Forensic Clinical Psychology. Because the doctoral program in Forensic Clinical Psychology begins in the Fall 1998 semester, this report does not cover the credentials of the faculty members involved in this program.

The seventeen graduate faculty members and the four associate graduate faculty members of the College of Criminal Justice all teach courses at the doctoral level. Each of these faculty members holds the earned doctorate in the teaching discipline or an appropriate related discipline. Justification for faculty teaching in this graduate program who have degrees in related disciplines and related professional experience is found in the faculty files in the Office of the President. Table 4.8.2.3.a shows the discipline of the terminal degrees held by these faculty members.

Table 4.8.2.3.a

Qualifications of Doctoral Faculty: Criminal Justice

Number of Faculty

Terminal Degree

Discipline

1PhDAdministration and Higher Education
1PhDCriminal Justice
3PhDCriminology
1PhDCriminal Justice and Criminology
1PhDGuidance
1PhDHistory
1DSLLaw
1PhDPolitical Science
4PhDPsychology
1PhDPublic Administration
6PhDSociology

The faculty member holding the PhD in history teaches the History of Violence, Penology, Crime and Punishment, and the Development of Law Enforcement Entities. The faculty member holding the PhD in Political Science has considerable experience as an instructor for a Police Training School for Officers, a police officer, a criminal investigator, a criminal justice planner, and a public administrator.

The six graduate faculty of the College of Education who teach doctoral courses in the Educational Leadership Program all hold the earned doctorate in the teaching discipline or a related discipline. Table 4.8.2.3.b shows the discipline of the terminal degrees held by these faculty members:

Table 4.8.2.3.b

Qualifications of Doctoral Faculty: Educational Leadership Program

Number of Faculty

Terminal Degree

Discipline

3PhDEducation Administration
1EdDEducation Administration
1EdDEducation: Elementary Education
1PhDSupervision, Curriculum, and Instruction

In addition to the six doctoral faculty of the Educational Leadership Program, there are twelve affiliate doctoral faculty from the areas of Library Science, Secondary Education, Counseling, Computing Science, Management, Criminal Justice, Bilingual Education, Mathematics, Curriculum and Instruction, and Political Science; three school administration faculty; and four field support faculty who provide educational expertise to the doctoral students. Each of these affiliate and school administration faculty holds the appropriate terminal degree and experience for participation in this program.

9. The Commission recognizes that in unusual cases institutions may appropriately include as graduate faculty members those who have demonstrated exceptional scholarly or creative activity, or professional experience, but who may not possess the required academic credentials. There also may be an occasion when a new graduate discipline is in its formative stage in higher education and there are no faculty members available with academic credentials in the discipline. In either case, when an institution presents evidence of competence or academic credentials other than the doctorate in the discipline for its graduate faculty, it must justify the employment of such faculty (Criteria 48).

The Faculty Committee determined that the University complies with this criterion.

One faculty member in the Department of Library Science does not have any graduate hours in library science; however, this individual holds a Doctor of Education in Curriculum and Instruction, with a specialization in adolescent and children’s literature. She also holds a BA degree in English Teacher Education and an MEd degree in Curriculum and Instruction. The teaching assignments of this faculty member have included LS 560: Literature for Children; LS 561: Current Trends in Materials for Children and Young Adults; and LS 580: Master’s Seminar. The LS 580 curriculum includes such topics as "Nonfiction Literature for Children and Young Adults" and "Selecting and Evaluating Multicultural Materials for Youth." The teaching experience and academic preparation of the individual in question support her competence in teaching these courses.

10. The Commission encourages interdisciplinary courses and recognizes that appropriate credentials for teaching may vary. The institution must document and justify the academic and professional preparation of faculty members teaching in such courses or programs (Criteria 48).

Sam Houston State University currently does not offer any graduate interdisciplinary courses.

11. It is the responsibility of the institution to keep on file, for all full-time and part-time faculty members teaching graduate courses, documentation of academic preparation, such as official transcripts and, if appropriate for demonstrating competence, official documentation of professional and work experience, technical and performance competency, records of publications, and certifications and other qualifications (Criteria 48-49).

The Faculty Committee determined that the University complies with this criterion.

Documentation of competency of all full-time and part-time faculty to teach graduate courses is on file in the appropriate academic offices.

12. An effective graduate program depends on the scholarly interaction of faculty. The appropriate number of faculty members to adequately support a program varies according to discipline and the scope of the program. However, for each graduate degree program, an institution must employ at least four qualified full-time faculty members whose responsibilities include teaching in the program (Criteria 49).

The Committee found that the University does not comply fully with this criterion.

Graduate degree programs and doctoral degree programs are summarized in Table 4.8.2.3.c.

Table 4.8.2.3.c

Graduate Degree Programs

A. Master’s Degree Programs

Graduate Degrees

No. of Degree Titles

No. of Degree Programs

MA2231
MBA11
MEd1620
MFA16
MLS11
MM16
MS810
Total5075

B. Doctoral Degree Programs

Graduate Degrees

Number of Degree Titles

Number of Degree Programs

EdD11
PhD22
Total33

At least four qualified full-time faculty members teach in each graduate degree program, with one exception: The Dance program, which in previous years has been in compliance with this criterion, last year lost one of its four full-time faculty. To date, the program has not appointed a full-time faculty to fill this vacancy, thus leaving the graduate faculty with only three full-time teachers. The Faculty Committee makes a recommendation to correct this situation in the recommendations and suggestions which follow this section.

Graduate faculty and associate graduate faculty members and their disciplines are summarized in Table 4.8.2.3.d. Most disciplines of faculty members are obvious. There are exceptions, however, as in the case of the degrees in Home Economics offered by the Department of Family and Consumer Sciences. The disciplines of the faculty are Fashion Merchandising and Design, Home Economics, Interior Design, Nutrition and Dietetics, and Vocational Home Economics.

Table 4.8.2.3.d

Graduate Degrees and Faculty

College

Disciplines

Number of Graduate Faculty

Number of Associate Graduate Faculty

Arts & SciencesArt71
 Biological Sciences140
 Chemistry80
 Dance30
 English225
 Geography21
 Geology32
 History84
 Computing Science62
 Mathematics182
 Music94
 Physics70
 Political Science82
 Sociology42
 Theatre30
Business AdministrationAccounting54
 Business Administration42
 Business Analysis11
 Economics60
 Finance23
 Management Information Systems11
 Marketing50
Criminal JusticeCriminal Justice174
Education & Applied ScienceAgriculture46
 Education2017
 Fashion Merchandising and Design01
 Home Economics10
 Health31
 Technology51
 Interior Design01
 Kinesiology51
 Library Science50
 Psychology110

RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS: SECTION 4.8.2.3

The Faculty Committee determined that Sam Houston State University complies fully with all but one of the imperatives in this section of the Criteria; to correct the instance of noncompliance, the Committee makes the following recommendation:

The Dance Program must hire at least one full-time faculty member to teach in its graduate program.

To improve the quality of graduate education at the University, the Committee also makes the following suggestions:

Even though at least 25% of the discipline course hours in the Journalism Program are taught by faculty members holding the terminal degree in that discipline or other appropriate credentials, when vacancies occur in the future the department should make every effort to recruit and employ faculty members with terminal degrees in journalism.

The Office of Graduate Studies should investigate the possibility of offering research assistantships for graduate students in the doctoral programs.

4.8.2.4 DISTANCE LEARNING PROGRAMS/ACTIVITIES

1. Institutions offering courses for credit through distance learning activities and programs must meet all criteria related to faculty.

2. Whether through direct contact or other appropriate means, institutions offering distance learning programs must provide students with structured access to and interaction with full-time faculty members.

The Faculty Committee determined that the University complies with these imperatives.

Sam Houston State University’s distance learning activities and programs are addressed in Section 4.5 (Distance Learning Programs) and Section 4.6 (Continuing Education, Outreach, and Service Programs) of the SACS Self-Study Report.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS: SECTION 4.8.2.4

Having determined that the University complies with the imperatives in this section of the Criteria, the Faculty Committee makes no recommendations.

4.8.3 PART-TIME FACULTY

Sam Houston State University has developed into a relatively large, diverse institution organized into four colleges, with authorization to offer six baccalaureate degrees, seven master’s degrees, and three doctoral degrees in three program areas. A well-qualified faculty has been critical to achieving and maintaining educational effectiveness related to the respective needs of this multifaceted organization and its academic programs. The number of full-time faculty members must be adequate to provide effective teaching, advising, and scholarly or creative activity, and be appropriate to participate in curriculum development, policy making, institutional planning and governance.

Full-time faculty have composed the teaching core at Sam Houston State University; however, part-time faculty provide an important dimension in delivering the University’s educational program. Part-time faculty include those working under contract whose special expertise is vital to the success of various programs.

Ten-year comparative data reflecting full-time to part-time faculty ratios are provided in Table 4.8.3.a below. These data indicate more than a two to one (2:1) overall ratio for the ten-year period 1988-89 to 1997-98. The data further show that the current 1997-98 faculty ratio of full-time to part-time faculty approximates the ten-year averages.

Table 4.8.3.a

Full-Time/Part-Time Faculty Comparisons: 1988-19981

 

Fall

Spring

 

Full-Time

Part-Time

Full-Time

Part-Time

 

#

%

#

%

#

%

#

%

97-9836469.516030.535869.116030.9
96-9735067.816632.234065.018335.0
95-9633364.818135.232862.219937.8
94-9534167.116732.934166.017634.0
93-9433568.815231.233067.515932.5
92-9333571.313528.733669.314930.7
91-9232875.110924.932670.713529.3
90-9133674.311625.733172.412627.6
89-9032077.99122.132075.110624.9
88-8930579.08221.031179.08321.0
Average334.771.6135.928.4332.169.6147.630.4

1 Source: Office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs

1. The number of full-time faculty members must be adequate to provide effective teaching, advising, and scholarly or creative activity, and be appropriate to participate in curriculum development, policy making, institutional planning, and governance (Criteria 49).

The Faculty Committee determined that the University complies with this imperative.

Responses to the self-study survey items (Table 4.8.3.b) indicate the degree to which faculty agree or disagree with various policies and practices concerning the employment of part-time faculty at the University.

Table 4.8.3.b

Perceptions of the Use of Part-Time Faculty at SHSU: Faculty Survey1

Response to statement: "The University...."

Survey #

Statement

Percentage in Agreement

Percentage in Disagreement

48a... is over-dependent upon part-time faculty to meet the needs of teaching.3838
48b... is over-dependent upon part-time faculty to meet the needs of advising.663
48c... is over-dependent upon part-time faculty to meet the needs of scholarly creative activity.470
48d... is over-dependent upon part-time faculty to meet the needs of committee responsibilities.470
43a... has an adequate number of full-time faculty to carry out effective departmental curriculum development.4239
43b... has an adequate number of full-time faculty to carry out effective departmental policy making.5424
43c... has an adequate number of full-time faculty to carry out effective departmental governance.5224
43d... has an adequate number of full-time faculty to carry out effective institutional planning.4528

1 Faculty responses to the Survey items related to this must statement are shown with the two Agree categories combined and the two Disagree categories combined.

Sam Houston State University traditionally prides itself on the quality of its teaching. However, as the table above indicates, the faculty responses to the survey items related to this imperative are equally divided (38%) on whether the University is or is not overly dependent on part-time faculty to carry out these teaching responsibilities. On the other hand, the faculty responses clearly show a strong belief that full-time faculty of the University adequately provide effective advising and accomplish creative and scholarly activities and that these responsibilities are met effectively without over-dependence on part-time faculty. In addition, the majority of the faculty respondents (approximately 2:1) perceive that their full-time faculty are adequate to carry out effectively curriculum development, policy making, and governance, as well as institutional planning.

2. The employment of part-time faculty members can provide expertise to enhance the educational effectiveness of an institution, but the number of part-time faculty members must be properly limited (Criteria 49).

The Committee determined that the University complies with this criterion.

Sam Houston State University limits the number of part-time faulty by staffing courses with as many full-time faculty as possible. As a matter of general guidance, and in accordance with Academic Policy Statement 890301, the use of part-time faculty is kept to a minimum; however, when budget constraints preclude the hiring of additional tenure-track faculty and when the number of courses needed to meet student demands exceeds the number that can reasonably be taught by full-time faculty, part-time instructors are used to fill this need. The various demands of each college and its program areas determine to what extent part-time faculty are needed. This complexity and variation are reflected in Table 4.8.3.c, "Part-Time Faculty Percentages by College, 1988-1998." (See Table 4.8.3.a, above, for variations in percentage ratios of part-time faculty over the past ten years.)

Table 4.8.3.c

Part-Time Faculty Percentages by College, 1988-19981

Years

Arts and Sciences

Business

Criminal Justice

Education and Applied Science

 

Fall

Spring

Fall

Spring

Fall

Spring

Fall

Spring

97-9821.924.733.331.227.629.044.942.1
96-9728.330.024.632.316.134.445.445.1
95-9631.731.732.832.810.720.746.252.4
94-9525.726.927.427.426.918.546.748.6
93-9424.927.517.219.026.929.646.845.6
92-9325.524.38.910.720.848.642.943.8
91-9223.626.59.014.048.340.029.237.9
90-9121.620.85.67.444.148.535.840.3
89-9019.018.85.77.528.032.133.639.1
88-8917.717.57.85.838.525.029.533.0
Percent Average23.9924.8717.2318.8128.7932.6440.142.79

1 Source: See Appendix A.

The higher percentage of part-time faculty in the College of Education and Applied Science reflects the attention to state mandates for the certification requirements in the Teacher Education program. Each semester this large University program collaborates with approximately thirty independent school districts within a hundred-mile radius. Supervision of pre-service teachers in their final student teaching semester requires the use of adjunct part-time faculty to

maintain the travel schedules for the required mentoring by a University supervisor.

In addition to the state mandates, the Teacher Education program complies with the supervision requirements for its accreditation by NCATE, National Council of Accreditation of Teacher Education, a five-year review and accreditation process. (Because only ten of sixty-seven teacher education programs in Texas meet these standards for this national accreditation for teacher preparation programs, SHSU’s is clearly among the best programs in the state.)

Since master’s level candidates in the Teacher Education program are full-time teachers and since there is no doctoral program in this department, no pool of graduate students exists to assist supervision of the approximately two hundred student teachers each semester. This need for supervisors is filled by part-time faculty.

Data from Table 4.8.3.c also reflect the rise in the part-time faculty percentages for the College of Business as a result of one of the many criteria (student-to-faculty ratio requirement) for earning the accreditation for business schools. (See Appendix A for full-time/part-time faculty comparisons by college, 1988-1998, by head count and FTEs.)

3. Part-time faculty members teaching courses for credit must meet the same requirements for professional, experiential and scholarly preparation as their full-time counterparts teaching in the same disciplines (Criteria 49).

The Committee found that the University complies with this "must" statement.

Academic Policy Statement 890301 in The Faculty Handbook clearly states the qualifications required for part-time faculty: "Part-time faculty must meet the same requirements for professional, experiential, and scholarly preparation as their full-time counterparts in the same disciplines." All the colleges and departments follow the stated policy.

Perceptions of faculty respondents to the self-study survey concerning the qualifications of part-time faculty are shown in Table 4.8.3.d:

Table 4.8.3.d

Faculty Perceptions of Part-Time Faculty Qualifications: Faculty Survey

Response to statement: "In my department, part-time faculty with teaching responsibilities..."

Survey #

Statement

Percentage in Agreement

Percentage in Disagreement

45a... meet the same criteria as full-time faculty for professional preparation.3541
45b... meet the same criteria as full-time faculty for experiential preparation.3037
45c... meet the same criteria as full-time faculty for scholarly preparation.2447

As previously noted (see Section 4.8.2.2, above), chairs of academic departments oversee the administration of Academic Policy Statement 890301 (The Faculty Handbook) regarding the hiring of properly credentialed faculty. However, survey data in the table above seem to indicate that some faculty are not convinced that part-time faculty in their respective departments meet criteria requirement in the areas of professional, experiential, and scholarly preparation.

4. Each institution must establish and publish comprehensive policies concerning the employment of part-time faculty members (Criteria 49).

The Faculty Committee determined that Sam Houston State University complies with the criterion.

The University has a clearly stated policy that guides the employment of part-time faculty (The Faculty Handbook, Academic Policy Statement 890301). However, faculty responses to Question 44 of the SACS survey indicate that some faculty are not aware of this policy. In response to the statement, "My department has a policy concerning the employment of part-time faculty," 35% agreed, while 29% disagreed.

5. The institution must also provide for appropriate orientation, supervision, and evaluation of all part-time faculty members (Criteria 49-50).

The Committee found that the University complies with this imperative.

Deans provide an orientation session for all new faculty, giving an overview and specifics on university and college procedures, as well as expectations on office hours and other departmental responsibilities. Department chairs and program coordinators provide further orientation, supervision, and evaluations for part-time faculty (see The Faculty Handbook, Academic Policy Statement 890301). In some instances, part-time faculty are assigned mentors.

The faculty’s perception of these policies and procedures are indicated in Table 4.8.3.e:

Table 4.8.3.e

Faculty Perceptions of Part-Time Faculty Orientation, Supervision, and Evaluation Policies and Practices: Faculty Survey

Response to statement: "For our part-time faculty, my department..."

Survey #

Statement

Percentage in Agreement

Percentage in Disagreement

46a... provides adequate orientation.2934
46b... provides adequate supervision.3236
46c... provides adequate evaluation2547

As the table suggests, faculty members may not be fully aware of the college and departmental support for new part-time faculty, perhaps because they do not attend orientation meetings or participate in the supervision of evaluation of part-time faculty unless they themselves are serving as mentors.

6. Procedures to ensure student access to part-time faculty members must be clearly stated and publicized (Criteria 50).

The Committee determined that the University complies with this criterion.

Information about required office hours, faculty availability to students, and any unique departmental situations is shared in orientation meetings with all new faculty, including new part-time faculty. The importance of student access to faculty is stressed at the departmental and college levels. Students have access to both part-time and full-time faculty during posted office hours. Part-time faculty who teach only evening classes meet students before and/or after class and make contact with students by way of telephone and e-mail. Faculty have office phone numbers published in their syllabi, and some faculty offer home phone numbers as well. To foster student access, faculty involved in field-based courses also state office hours at the field campus sites, as well as at University offices.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS: SECTION 4.8.3

Having determined that the University complies with all of the imperatives in this section of the Criteria, the Faculty Committee has no recommendations. The Committee offers the following three suggestions, however:

Full-time faculty for each department should participate in the budget/planning processes for staffing courses to ensure that the need to use part-time faculty is anticipated but properly limited.

At the departmental level, the concerns of the faculty could be addressed with better communication about the issues of selection and hiring of part-time faculty.

Program administrators should develop strategies to keep all faculty apprised of procedures relating to the employment of part-time faculty.

4.8.4 GRADUATE TEACHING ASSISTANTS

General information about graduate teaching assistants (referred to as Assistant Instructors) is provided in the graduate catalogue. Specific guidelines are outlined in Academic Policy Statement 890303 ("Employment of Graduate Teaching Assistants [Assistant Instructors])," Academic Policy Statement 800114 ("Academic Instructional Staffing"), and Academic Policy Statement 871214 ("English Language Proficiency for Instructional Personnel").

1. The employment of graduate teaching assistants is a well-established practice in higher education, but should be carefully monitored (Criteria 50).

2. An institution must avoid heavy dependence on graduate teaching assistants to conduct classroom instruction (Criteria 50).

The Faculty Committee determined that the University complies with these imperatives.

Table 4.8.4.a, below, provides a breakdown of the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) positions of assistant instructors compared to those for full- and part-time faculty in each of the four colleges for the fall semester of 1997. The grand total was 488.01 FTE generated. Of the 488.01 FTE, assistant instructors generated 52.50 FTE, or 10.7%.

Table 4.8.4.a

Full- and Part-Time Faculty and Assistant Instructors for Fall 19971

College

Full- and Part-Time

Assistant Instructors2

Grand Total

 

Number

FTE

Number

FTE

Number

FTE

Arts & Sciences274244.857435.75348280.60
Business Administration6352.7510.506453.25
Criminal Justice2924.25157.504431.75
Education & Applied Science158113.66218.75179122.41
Total524435.5111152.50635488.01

1 Source: Fall 1997 Semester Report for Vice President for Academic Affairs

2 Assistant Instructors (Graduate Assistants) make up 17% of the grand total.

The title "assistant instructor" embraces three categories: teaching assistant instructors (TAs), who are responsible for teaching courses and assigning grades; nonteaching assistant instructors who conduct research, supervise laboratories, or assist faculty with classroom preparation; and doctoral teaching fellows in the College of Criminal Justice who have completed a master’s degree prior to entering the doctoral program. As Table 4.8.4.b indicates, twenty-six FTEs were generated by teaching assistant instructors, and 26.5 were generated by nonteaching assistant instructors.

Table 4.8.4.b

A Comparison of Number and FTE Positions for Teaching and

Nonteaching Assistant Instructors for Fall 19971

College

Teaching Assistant Instructors

Nonteaching Assistant Instructors

Grand Total

 

Number

FTE

Number

FTE

Number

FTE

Arts & Sciences2914.504721.257635.75
Business Administration----10.501.50
Criminal Justice10 2 5.0052.50157.50
Education & Applied Science146.5072.25218.75
Total5326.006026.5011352.50

1 Source: Offices of each Academic Dean

2 Doctoral teaching fellows in the College of Criminal Justice compose this number (10=5 FTE).

When nonteaching FTEs are excluded and only teaching assistant instructors and full- and part-time faculty are considered, the teaching assistant instructors accounted for only 5.6% of the FTEs generated. When the FTEs generated by both the nonteaching assistant instructors and the doctoral teaching fellows were excluded (all doctoral teaching fellows have completed a master’s degree), only 4.3% of the FTEs were generated by assistant instructors.

Responding to the faculty survey statement number 50 that "My department is overly dependent upon graduate teaching assistants to carry out classroom instruction," 90% of the faculty either strongly disagreed, disagreed, or neither agreed or disagreed with the statement, and 86% of the department chairs either strongly disagreed, disagreed, or neither agreed nor disagreed.

3. Each institution employing graduate teaching assistants must provide a published set of guidelines for institution-wide graduate assistantship administration, including appointment criteria, remuneration, rights and responsibilities, evaluation and reappointment (Criteria 50).

The Committee determined that the University complies with this "must" statement.

As mandated by Academic Policy Statement 800114, "Academic Instructional Staffing," position vacancies for assistant instructors are advertised in fliers and handbills widely developed and distributed either by the department or the college. The policy determines selection criteria thus:

Criteria for the selection of Assistant Instructors include undergraduate grade point average; experience; performance on the GRE or GMAT Exam; and letters of recommendation . . . . Instructor positions are allocated by the appropriate academic dean based upon available funding. Once a preferred candidate has been selected by the hiring unit, it is the responsibility of the dean to make a written offer to the candidate. If the position is accepted, the dean will forward the entire personnel file to the Vice President for Academic Affairs. The file should contain an Application for Assistant Instructorship, official transcript(s), at least three letters of recommendation, a Payroll Action Form, and other pertinent sign-up papers as required by the Payroll and Human Resources Departments.

Remuneration for assistant instructor services consists of a stipend paid bi-monthly and benefits (health insurance). Out-of-state or out-of-country tuition is waived for assistant instructors, who pay in-state tuition and fees required of resident students (Academic Policy Statement 890303, "Employment of Graduate Teaching Assistants"). Table 4.8.4.c indicates the salary variance for assistant instructors among the colleges at Sam Houston State University:

Table 4.8.4.c

Comparison of Sam Houston State University Assistant Instructors’

Salaries Among the Four Colleges, 1997-981

College

Number of Assistant Instructors Within College

Salary Per Semester

Arts & Sciences74$2,736 ($608 per month)
Business Administration1$2,745 ($610 per month)
Criminal Justice15$3,006 (MA at $668 per month)
$5,004 (Doctoral at $1,112 per month)
Education & Applied Science21$2,736 ($608 per month)

1 Source: Survey by Faculty Senate, Fall 1997

Assistant instructors earn a minimum of $5,472 for a nine-month period for a .5 FTE position, with an average salary of $10,954 per FTE position. Table 4.8.4.d presents the minimum salaries for Sam Houston State University and four comparable public senior colleges and universities. The average salary paid to teaching assistant instructors at other Texas public senior colleges and universities for 1997-1998 is $5,314. The minimum salaries for Sam Houston State University and four comparable public senior colleges and universities are as follow:

Table 4.8.4.d

A Comparison of Sam Houston State University’s and Sister Universities’ Minimum Salaries for Assistant Instructors, 1997-981

Institution

Salary: Assistant Instructor

Angelo State University$4,600
Lamar University$4,000
Sam Houston State University$5,472
Stephen F. Austin State University$6,000
Southwest Texas State University$6,500

1 Source: Telephone Survey conducted by the Office of Graduate Studies, Sam Houston State University, Fall 1997

Even though the minimum salary for assistant instructors at Sam Houston State University is average when compared with other universities, this is the same salary reported in the SACS Self-Study accreditation report ten years ago. In the spring of 1998, the Sam Houston State University Faculty Senate, as a result of the above survey of sister institutions on assistant instructors salaries, recommended to the Academic Policy Council that assistant instructors receive a 15% salary increase.

A description of the role and responsibilities of an assistant instructor is also found in the 1997-1999Graduate Catalogue (33); more specific guidelines are outlined in the Academic Policy Statement 890303, "Employment of Graduate Teaching Assistants":

The term "assistant instructor," as used at Sam Houston State University, indicates a graduate student who is employed by the University on a part-time basis, usually one-quarter or one-half time, to teach lower-division courses and/or laboratories under the supervision of a full-time faculty member. A half-time assistant instructor normally is responsible for two courses, or four laboratories, or twenty clock hours of duty each week and is expected to be enrolled in six to nine semester hours of course work each semester.

The policy statement continues with further guidelines for the hiring of assistant instructors:

Positions of Assistant Instructor are made available to a limited number of graduate students each year. The purposes of the Assistant Instructor Program are to aid in financing the graduate studies of outstanding students and to provide experiences in the instructional program through the assignment of duties designed to support and improve the total instructional program of the University . . . . Assistant instructors may not normally hold other salaried positions from the University. An exception of this rule may be made after the written approval of the appropriate academic dean.

Academic Policy Statement 890303 specifies that the division/ department chairs have the responsibility to see that all assistant instructors receive periodic orientation, training, supervision, and evaluation necessary to ensure their effective performance.

Assistant instructors are usually appointed for one academic year, but the position may be renewed for a second year. Only in unusual circumstances will an assistant instructor be considered for a fifth semester or third year (Academic Policy Statement 890303, "Employment of Graduate Teaching Assistants"). Assistant instructors must have a minimum overall grade point average not less than 3.0 and have a satisfactory work performance record in order to retain their positions.

Faculty survey responses indicated that 23% of the faculty believe that their departments have written guidelines for the employment of assistant instructors, while 15% disagreed and 62% neither agreed nor disagreed or did not know. However, 61% of the chairs agreed that they had published guidelines.

4. Graduate assistants who have primary responsibility for teaching a course for credit and/or for assigning final grades for such a course, and whose professional and scholarly preparation does not satisfy the provisions of Section 4.8.2 must have earned at least 18 graduate semester hours in their teaching discipline, be under the direct supervision of a faculty member experienced in the teaching discipline, receive regular in-service training and be evaluated regularly (Criteria 50).

The Faculty Committee determined that the University complies with this imperative.

According to Academic Policy Statement 890303 ("Employment of Graduate Teaching Assistants"),

An assistant instructor must have earned at least eighteen graduate semester hours of credit in [his or her] teaching field. This requirement does not apply to assistant instructors who are engaged in assignments such as providing laboratory assistance, teaching physical education activity courses, attending and helping to prepare lectures, grading papers, keeping class records, and conducting discussion groups. The policy further specifies that assistant instructors who have the primary responsibility for teaching a course or laboratory for credit and assigning final grades must be under the direct supervision of an experienced faculty member in the teaching field, must receive regular in-service training, and must be regularly evaluated. Division or department chairs are responsible for ensuring that the orientation/training, supervision, and evaluation of assistant instructors are accomplished.

Department Chair/Coordinator survey responses indicated that 63% of the chairs agree that graduate assistants receive professional orientation, 67% agree that their units provide in-service training, and 87% agree that graduate teaching assistants are supervised by qualified faculty.

5. Institutions may appoint graduate teaching assistants for whom English is a second language only when a test of spoken English, or other reliable evidence of the applicant’s proficiency in oral and written communication, indicates that the appointment is appropriate (Criteria 50).

The Committee found that the University complies with this criterion.

The dean of each college has the responsibility for evaluating an applicant’s oral and written English. According to Academic Policy Statement 871214 ("English Language Proficiency for Instructional Personnel"), individuals being interviewed for an instructional position at Sam Houston State University will be carefully evaluated prior to being hired to ensure that they possess effective communication skills in the English language. If there is reason to believe that the individual’s ability to express himself/herself clearly in the English language is in doubt, the academic dean (a) requires that instructional personnel whose primary language is not English take the Test of Spoken English (TSE) administered by the Educational Testing Service or (b) requires that instructional personnel whose primary language is English meet with a committee of three faculty members appointed by the appropriate academic dean.

According to Academic Policy Statement 890303 ("Employment of Graduate Teaching Assistants [Assistant Instructors]"), "each written recommendation for the employment of assistant instructors will bear an endorsement from the appropriate academic dean certifying that the candidate has been evaluated as to his/her English language proficiency and is qualified to fill this position vacancy."

Faculty responses to survey question number 51 indicated that 85% of the faculty either strongly agreed, agreed, or neither agreed or disagreed that graduate assistants must demonstrate proficiency in oral and written English. All departmental chairs (100%) either strongly agreed, agreed, or neither agreed nor disagreed with the statement.

6. Institutions employing graduate teaching assistants must provide a structure for administrative oversight at a level above that of the individual academic units to ensure conformity with institutional policies and procedures (Criteria 50).

The Committee found that the University complies with this "must" statement.

While the division/department chairs have the responsibilities of recruiting, hiring, providing orientation and in-service training, supervising, and evaluating assistant instructors within their academic units, the dean of each respective college has the responsibility of ensuring conformity with institutional policies and procedures within his/her academic unit.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS: SECTION 4.8.4

The Faculty Committee determined that the University complies fully with the imperatives in this section of the Criteria; there are no recommendations. To attract students to graduate programs at the University, however, the Committee proposes the following suggestion:

Even though the salaries of assistant instructors at Sam Houston State University stand at the mid-point in comparison to those of assistant instructors at sister institutions, the salary increase recommended by the Faculty Senate would be beneficial in attracting graduate students.

4.8.5 FACULTY COMPENSATION

1. An institution should provide adequate salaries and benefits to attract and retain able faculty members. The institution should also provide a retirement plan, to which it contributes a reasonable percentage of the cost, and a plan for adequate insurance coverage (Criteria 51).

2. Salary increases must be based on clearly stated criteria (Criteria 51).

The Faculty Committee determined that Sam Houston State University complies with both of these imperatives.

Since Sam Houston State University is a state institution, the faculty salaries budget is mandated by the legislature of the state of Texas. Other benefits such as medical and dental insurance, unemployment and workman’s compensation, retirement, and life insurance are also determined by the legislature’s requirements and funding. The legislature, in its biennial meeting, recommends the percentage of annual faculty salary increase for universities throughout the state. Individual institutions may supplement state allocations through additional funding drawn from local sources.

The state average increase in faculty salaries for 1997-98 was 4.8%. The increase at SHSU for the same period was 3.3%. In all but one fiscal year during the past decade, the percentage salary increase at SHSU was less than the average percentage increase in the state. During the 1998 fiscal year SHSU ranked nineteenth of thirty-five state universities in average faculty salaries. The University’s ranking on faculty salaries in the state has declined over the decade from ninth to nineteenth. Similarly, the deviation of the University’s average faculty salary from the state average has increased from a low of $1,501 in fiscal year 1989 to a high of $7,643 in fiscal year 1998, suggesting that faculty salaries at SHSU have become increasingly less competitive. (See Tables 4.8.5.a, 4.8.5.b, and 4.8.5.c, and Figures 1 and 2.)

Table 4.8.5.a

Total Nine-Month Salaries for Full-Time Faculty at Texas Public Senior Colleges and Universities in First Four Ranks, 1988-981

Year

Percent Increase

Average Salary

SHSU Rank Average Salary

Average Salary

Deviation from Average Salary

 

SHSU

State

 

SHSU

State

 
1988-89----9$38,003$39,504- $1501
1989-903.85.79$39,430$41,756- $2326
1990-911.23.711$39,908$43,299- $3391
1991-921.51.911$40,501$44,125- $3624
1992-932.22.211$41,400$45,086- $3686
1993-942.93.512$42,614$46,654- $4040
1994-951.62.716$43,284$47,932- $4648
1995-962.23.214$44,879$49,351- $4472
1996-972.46.316$45,866$52,470- $6604
1997-983.34.819$47,364$55,007- $7643

1 Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board reports, 1988-1998

As Table 4.8.5.a indicates, the increase in average faculty salaries at SHSU from fiscal year 1996 to fiscal year 1997 was 2.4%, but the change in the Consumer Price Index for the same period was 3% (Academy, March-April, 1997: 83); the percentage increase in real terms, then, was -0.6.

Table 4.8.5.b compares the average salary by rank at SHSU in 1997 with the average national salaries and average regional salaries of public universities in Category IIA institutions (that is, comprehensive institutions):

Table 4.8.5.b

Comparison of Average Comprehensive Salaries by Rank at SHSU, Regionally, and Nationally at Category IIA Institutions1

Institution

Salary: Professor

Salary: Associate Professor

Salary: Assistant Professor

Salary: Instructor

SHSU$66,000$53,700$44,700$31,572
National$73,688$60,222$50,265$38,569
West South Central Region

(TX,LA,AR,OK)
$67,176$55,314$46,203$36,183

1 Source: Academy, March-April, 1997: 83

The salary figures for SHSU in the table above include a portion of the Federal Social Security Program contribution, which is paid by the state. Compared with both the national and regional averages for similar universities, SHSU’s salaries are less than those for the same rank in the top three ranks.

Figure 1

Comparison of Average Faculty Salaries

At SHSU and Across the State

(Salaries expressed in 1,000s)

Figure 2

Percent Increase in Faculty Salaries

At SHSU and Across the State

Responses to Item 13 of the Self-Study Faculty Survey indicate that 60% of the faculty responding to the survey either disagreed or strongly disagreed that the University provides adequate compensation to its faculty. Fifty-two percent of the faculty responding to the survey think salaries at SHSU are not competitive with comparable institutions in our region (Item 14). Twenty-one percent neither agreed nor disagreed with the statement. Only 14% agreed or strongly agreed with the statement.

As Table 4.8.5.c and Figure 3 indicate, as compared with average faculty salaries at other major Category IIA public universities in the state of Texas, the average faculty salary at SHSU is fairly competitive, except at the level of instructor.

Table 4.8.5.c

Average Comprehensive Faculty Salaries by Rank

At SHSU and Comparable Universities in Texas1

University

Salary: Professor

Salary: Associate Professor

Salary: Assistant Professor

Salary: Instructor

SHSU$66,000$53,700$44,700$31,572
Stephen F. Austin$62,000$49,800$45,400$38,900
Southwest Texas$67,000$55,100$45,500$36,900

1 Source: Academy, March-April, 1997: 83

Figure 3

Comparison of Faculty Salaries by Rank

At SHSU and Comparable Universities in Texas

Each year faculty are evaluated for merit increases in salary. These merit increases are permanent additions to salary and not annual bonuses. The amount of money available each year for merit pay increases has varied, depending upon the merit pool. No merit money at all, for example, was available in fiscal years 1992 and 1995. The amount of money available for merit pay increases in other years during the past decade has ranged from 2% to 3% of the faculty salary budget. In fiscal year 1998 faculty received an across-the-board increase of 2% or $900 per nine-month contract salary in addition to merit increases for those who qualified for those awards.

The average salary at SHSU by rank of men and women in fiscal year 1998 is compared in Table 4.8.5.d:

Table 4.8.5.d

Average Salary by Rank and Gender, 1997-981

Gender

Salary: Professor

Salary: Associate Professor

Salary: Assistant Professor

Women$53,600$41,400$34,500
Men$54,400$44,200$36,500

1 Source: Academy, March-April, 1997: 83

As the table indicates, the salaries of faculty women are lower on average than those of men in the three top ranks. Salaries of women are on average less than those of men by anywhere from $800 to $2,600 per year. This disparity may be due to such things as differing credentials and experience and length of service. Furthermore, it is possible that women on the faculty disproportionately have appointments in disciplines where the average salary is below the average University salary.

State agencies were formerly authorized to pay a portion of employee contributions on social security coverage of their employees. However, the 74th Legislature amended the Texas Government Code so that state employees are required to pay contributions on wages in the amount of the employee tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. For employees who are appointed half-time or more, the state legislature mandates policies and provides funding for insurance programs, including group health, term life, and accidental death and dismemberment. The state mandated that since state employers no longer have to pay for employee social security contributions, any salary and wages paid to eligible state employees after December 31, 1995, must include benefit replacement pay. That replacement benefit is equal to the sum of 5.85% of the FICA covered wages earned by the employee during the pay period (not to exceed $16,500) and an amount equal to the additional retirement contribution paid by the employee because of the benefit replacement pay. The amount paid on the behalf of eligible employees, not including the retirement contribution, may not exceed $965.25 each