| Faculty Senate Survey Results - NGL (2002 - 2003) | |||||||||||
| Faculty Profiles % and # of responses for each question | |||||||||||
| Question | |||||||||||
| College | Total | A&S | COBA | EDU | CJ | NGL | |||||
| 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | |||||||
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||||||
| Rank | Total | Lect. | Inst. | Assist. | Assoc. | Prof. | |||||
| 0% | 33% | 0% | 67% | 0% | |||||||
| 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Scholar | Total | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | ||||
| 0% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 33% | ||||||
| 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||||
| Growth | Total | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | ||||
| 0% | 0% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | ||||||
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |||||
| Committees | Total | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | ||||
| 0% | 33% | 0% | 33% | 33% | 0% | ||||||
| 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |||||
| For questions 1 through 55 please rate each of the activities using the following scale: | |||||||||||
| 5 = much more than satisfactory 3 = satisfactory 1 = much less than satisfactory | |||||||||||
| 4 = more than satisfactory 2 = less than satisfactory NA = unknown or not applicable | |||||||||||
| Evaluate the Following: | |||||||||||
| Avg. | Std. Dev. | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | NA | ||||
| 1 | University President (Gaertner) | 3.50 | 0.71 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 2 | Vice President for Academic Affairs (Payne) | 3.50 | 0.71 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 3 | Vice President for Finance and Ops. (J. Parker) | 2.00 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 4 | Vice President for Student Services (Douglass) | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 5 | Vice President for Univ. Advancement (Holmes) | 2.00 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 6 | Associate VP for Academic Affairs (Eglsaer) | 3.00 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 7 | Associate VP for Finance and Ops. (Gilliam) | 3.00 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 8 | Associate VP for Info. Resources (Stevens) | 3.00 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 9 | Associate VP for Res. & Spon. Progs. (Plishker) | 3.00 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 10 | Associate VP for Std. Services (F. Parker) | 3.00 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 11 | Your Dean | 4.00 | 1.41 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 12 | Alumni Relations | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 13 | Athletics | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 14 | Career Services | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 15 | Computer Services | 3.67 | 1.15 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 16 | Contracts and Grants | 3.00 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 17 | Correspondence Course Division | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 18 | Counseling and ADA Services | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 19 | Financial Aid | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 20 | Food Service/Aramark | 3.50 | 0.71 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 21 | Health and Kinesiology Center | 3.67 | 0.58 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 22 | Health Center | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 23 | Honors Program | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 24 | Human Resources | 3.00 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 25 | International Programs | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 26 | Library Services | 4.33 | 0.58 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 27 | Lowman Student Center | 3.00 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 28 | Office of Graduate Studies | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 29 | Physical Plant | 3.00 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 30 | Post Office | 3.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 31 | Public Relations | 3.00 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 32 | Public Safety Services (University Police) | 3.00 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 33 | Purchasing | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 34 | Recreational Sports and Activities | 3.50 | 0.71 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 35 | Recruitment | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 36 | Registrar's Office | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 37 | Research and Sponsored Programs | 3.00 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 38 | Residence Life | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 39 | SAM Center-Advising | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 40 | SAM Center Mentoring | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 41 | Sam Houston Press | 3.00 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 42 | Sam Houston Writing Center | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 43 | Student Activities | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 44 | Student Life | 3.00 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 45 | Undergraduate Admissions | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 46 | University Advancement | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 47 | University Bookstore | 3.00 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 48 | University Safety Office | 2.00 | 1.41 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 49 | Budget (Operations and Maintenance) | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 50 | Funding of Research | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 51 | Selection of Administrators | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 52 | Selection of Faculty | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 53 | Strategic Planning | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 54 | Teaching Assignments | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 55 | Teaching Overloads | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| For questions 56 through 80 please rate each of the activities using the following scale: | |||||||||||
| 5 = much more than satisfactory 3 = satisfactory 1 = much less than satisfactory | |||||||||||
| 4 = more than satisfactory 2 = less than satisfactory NA = unknown or not applicable | |||||||||||
| Evaluate student services in the following areas: | |||||||||||
| Avg. | Std. Dev. | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | NA | ||||
| 56 | The library meets the needs of my department's curriculum. | 4.67 | 0.58 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 57 | The Student Service Fee allocations are effective in supporting student programs. | 4.50 | 0.71 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 58 | The University Faculty Senate is effective in representing faculty views to the administration. | 4.33 | 0.58 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 59 | The resources available to provide a successful graduate program are adequate. | 3.50 | 0.71 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 60 | The allocation of travel reimbursements meets the needs of the faculty. | 3.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 61 | The student instrument to appraising my teaching effectiveness is fair. | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 62 | I support online student evaluations of my teaching effectiveness. | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 63 | The appraisal of my teaching effectiveness by my chair/coordinator (FES) fairly reflects my teaching performance. | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 64 | My salary is appropriate relative to my contribution to SHSU. | 4.00 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 65 | My salary is appropriate relative to my current rank when compared to similar universities. | 4.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 66 | The merit system (as stated in the Faculty Handbook) is applied fairly. | 4.33 | 0.58 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 67 | The promotion system (as stated in the Faculty Handbook) is applied fairly. | 4.33 | 0.58 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 68 | The tenure system (as stated in the Faculty Handbook) is applied fairly in my department. | 4.33 | 0.58 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 69 | The performance evaluation (post tenure review) of tenured faculty is applied fairly in my dept. | 4.50 | 0.71 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 70 | Reassigned time is applied fairly in my college. | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 71 | The current program of mandatory advisement of students is effective. | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 72 | The selection criteria for international program awards are reasonable. | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 73 | I am satisfied with the new guidelines for the Research Enhancement Fund Grants. | 4.00 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 74 | I am satisfied with the new guidelines for the Faculty Support Fund. | 4.00 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 75 | I am satisfied with the support received from the Office of Res. and Spon. Prog. to aid me in applying for and receiving these grants (73 and 74). | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 76 | Yes or No, did you apply for either the Research Enhancement Fund or the Faculty Support Fund. | Yes = | 0 | No = | 1 | 2 | |||||
| 77 | Yes or No, did you receive either the Research Enhancement Fund or the Faculty Support Fund. | Yes = | 0 | No = | 1 | 2 | |||||
| 78 | I support online courses. | 4.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 79 | I support online degrees. | 3.50 | 0.71 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 80 | Overall, I am satisfied with my job at SHSU. | 4.67 | 0.58 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||