Faculty Senate Survey Results - CJ (2002 - 2003)
Faculty Profiles                % and # of responses for each question            
Question
College Total A&S COBA EDU CJ NGL  
0% 0% 0% 100% 0%
2 0 0 0 2 0
Rank Total Lect. Inst. Assist. Assoc. Prof.  
0% 0% 0% 50% 50%
2 0 0 0 1 1
Scholar Total 0 1 2 3 4 5+  
0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0%
2 0 0 0 2 0 0
Growth Total 0 1 2 3 4 5+  
0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0%
2 0 0 2 0 0 0
Committees Total 0 1 2 3 4 5+  
0% 0% 0% 50% 0% 50%
2 0 0 0 1 0 1
 
For questions 1 through 55 please rate each of the activities using the following scale:
5 = much more than satisfactory           3 = satisfactory                         1 = much less than satisfactory
4 = more than satisfactory                     2 = less than satisfactory        NA = unknown or not applicable 
Evaluate the Following:
Avg. Std. Dev. 5 4 3 2 1 NA
1 University President (Gaertner) 5.00 0.00 2 0 0 0 0 0
2 Vice President for Academic Affairs (Payne) 3.50 2.12 1 0 0 1 0 0
3 Vice President for Finance and Ops. (J. Parker) 3.00 0.00 0 0 2 0 0 0
4 Vice President for Student Services (Douglass) 1.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 2 0
5 Vice President for Univ. Advancement (Holmes) 4.00 #DIV/0! 0 1 0 0 0 1
6 Associate VP for Academic Affairs (Eglsaer) 4.50 0.71 1 1 0 0 0 0
7 Associate VP for Finance and Ops. (Gilliam) 3.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 1 0 0 1
8 Associate VP for Info. Resources (Stevens) 2.50 0.71 0 0 1 1 0 0
9 Associate VP for Res. & Spon. Progs. (Plishker) 2.50 0.71 0 0 1 1 0 0
10 Associate VP for Std. Services (F. Parker) 4.00 1.41 1 0 1 0 0 0
11 Your Dean 3.00 2.83 1 0 0 0 1 0
12 Alumni Relations 4.50 0.71 1 1 0 0 0 0
13 Athletics 4.00 #DIV/0! 0 1 0 0 0 1
14 Career Services 2.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 0 1 0 1
15 Computer Services 3.00 0.00 0 0 2 0 0 0
16 Contracts and Grants 2.00 1.41 0 0 1 0 1 0
17 Correspondence Course Division #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 0 2
18 Counseling and ADA Services 3.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 1 0 0 1
19 Financial Aid 3.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 1 0 0 1
20 Food Service/Aramark 3.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 1 0 0 1
21 Health and Kinesiology Center 5.00 #DIV/0! 1 0 0 0 0 1
22 Health Center 4.00 #DIV/0! 0 1 0 0 0 1
23 Honors Program 4.50 0.71 1 1 0 0 0 0
24 Human Resources 3.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 1 0 0 1
25 International Programs 5.00 #DIV/0! 1 0 0 0 0 1
26 Library Services 4.00 0.00 0 2 0 0 0 0
27 Lowman Student Center 4.00 #DIV/0! 0 1 0 0 0 1
28 Office of Graduate Studies 2.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 0 1 0 1
29 Physical Plant 4.00 #DIV/0! 0 1 0 0 0 1
30 Post Office #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 0 2
31 Public Relations 4.00 #DIV/0! 0 1 0 0 0 1
32 Public Safety Services (University Police) 3.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 1 0 0 1
33 Purchasing #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 0 2
34 Recreational Sports and Activities 4.00 #DIV/0! 0 1 0 0 0 1
35 Recruitment 3.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 1 0 0 1
36 Registrar's Office 4.00 0.00 0 2 0 0 0 0
37 Research and Sponsored Programs 2.50 0.71 0 0 1 1 0 0
38 Residence Life #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 0 2
39 SAM Center-Advising 4.00 #DIV/0! 0 1 0 0 0 1
40 SAM Center Mentoring 4.00 #DIV/0! 0 1 0 0 0 1
41 Sam Houston Press 4.00 0.00 0 2 0 0 0 0
42 Sam Houston Writing Center 4.00 #DIV/0! 0 1 0 0 0 1
43 Student Activities 3.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 1 0 0 1
44 Student Life 3.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 1 0 0 1
45 Undergraduate Admissions 4.00 #DIV/0! 0 1 0 0 0 1
46 University Advancement 4.00 #DIV/0! 0 1 0 0 0 1
47 University Bookstore #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 0 2
48 University Safety Office #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 0 2
49 Budget (Operations and Maintenance) #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 0 2
50 Funding of Research #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 0 2
51 Selection of Administrators #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 0 2
52 Selection of Faculty #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 0 2
53 Strategic Planning #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 0 2
54 Teaching Assignments #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 0 2
55 Teaching Overloads #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 0 2
For questions 56 through 80 please rate each of the activities using the following scale:
5 = much more than satisfactory           3 = satisfactory                         1 = much less than satisfactory
4 = more than satisfactory                     2 = less than satisfactory        NA = unknown or not applicable 
Evaluate student services in the following areas:
Avg. Std. Dev. 5 4 3 2 1 NA
56 The library meets the needs of my department's curriculum. 4.00 #DIV/0! 0 1 0 0 0 1
57 The Student Service Fee allocations are effective in supporting student programs. #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 0 2
58 The University Faculty Senate is effective in representing faculty views to the administration. 3.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 1 0 0 1
59 The resources available to provide a successful graduate program are adequate. 2.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 0 1 0 1
60 The allocation of travel reimbursements meets the needs of the faculty. 3.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 1 0 0 1
61 The student instrument to appraising my teaching effectiveness is fair. 3.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 1 0 0 1
62 I support online student evaluations of my teaching effectiveness. 1.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 1 1
63 The appraisal of my teaching effectiveness by my chair/coordinator (FES) fairly reflects my teaching performance. 3.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 1 0 0 1
64 My salary is appropriate relative to my contribution to SHSU. 4.00 #DIV/0! 0 1 0 0 0 1
65 My salary is appropriate relative to my current rank when compared to similar universities. 4.00 #DIV/0! 0 1 0 0 0 1
66 The merit system (as stated in the Faculty Handbook) is applied fairly. 2.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 0 1 0 1
67 The promotion system (as stated in the Faculty Handbook) is applied fairly. 3.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 1 0 0 1
68 The tenure system (as stated in the Faculty Handbook) is applied fairly in my department. 4.00 #DIV/0! 0 1 0 0 0 1
69 The performance evaluation (post tenure review) of tenured faculty is applied fairly in my dept. 3.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 1 0 0 1
70 Reassigned time is applied fairly in my college. 1.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 1 1
71 The current program of mandatory advisement of students is effective. #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 0 2
72 The selection criteria for international program awards are reasonable. #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 0 2
73 I am satisfied with the new guidelines for the Research Enhancement Fund Grants. 3.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 1 0 0 1
74 I am satisfied with the new guidelines for the Faculty Support Fund. #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 0 2
75 I am satisfied with the support received from the Office of Res. and Spon. Prog. to aid me in applying for and receiving these grants (73 and 74). 3.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 1 0 0 1
76 Yes or No, did you apply for either the Research Enhancement Fund or the Faculty Support Fund. Yes =  0 No =  1 1
77 Yes or No, did you receive either the Research Enhancement Fund or the Faculty Support Fund. Yes =  0 No =  1 1
78 I support online courses. 3.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 1 0 0 1
79 I support online degrees. 3.00 #DIV/0! 0 0 1 0 0 1
80 Overall, I am satisfied with my job at SHSU. 4.00 #DIV/0! 0 1 0 0 0 1