Criminal Justice Survey Results 01_02

Faculty Senate Survey Results - CJ
Faculty Profiles                % and # of responses for each question            
Question
College Total A&S COBA EDU CJ NGL  
0% 0% 0% 100% 0%
9 0 0 0 9 0
Rank Total Lect. Inst. Assist. Assoc. Prof.  
0% 0% 11% 44% 44%
9 0 0 1 4 4
Scholar Total 0 1 2 3 4 5+  
11% 0% 11% 22% 22% 33%
9 1 0 1 2 2 3
Growth Total 0 1 2 3 4 5+  
0% 22% 44% 11% 0% 22%
9 0 2 4 1 0 2
Committees Total 0 1 2 3 4 5+  
0% 11% 11% 22% 22% 33%
9 0 1 1 2 2 3
 
For questions 1 through 53 please rate each of the activities using the following scale:
5 = much more than satisfactory           3 = satisfactory                         1 = much less than satisfactory
4 = more than satisfactory                      2 = less than satisfactory        NA = unknown or not applicable 
Evaluate the Following:
Avg. Std. Dev. 5 4 3 2 1 NA
1 University President 3.88 0.99 2 4 1 1 0 1
2 Vice President for Academic Affairs 3.00 1.41 1 3 2 1 2 0
3 Vice President for Finance and Operations 2.29 1.38 0 2 1 1 3 2
4 Vice President for Student Services 1.88 1.13 0 1 1 2 4 1
5 Vice President for University Advancement 2.00 1.26 0 1 1 1 3 3
6 Associate VP for Academic Affairs 2.67 1.86 1 2 0 0 3 3
7 Associate VP for Finance and Operations 2.00 1.15 0 0 2 0 2 5
8 Associate VP for Information Resources 1.75 0.96 0 0 1 1 2 5
9 Associate VP for Res. & Graduate Studies 2.20 1.30 0 1 1 1 2 4
10 Associate VP for Std. Ser. & Dean Std. Life 3.38 1.19 1 3 3 0 1 1
11 Your Dean 2.63 1.41 1 1 2 2 2 1
12 Academic Enrichment Center 3.60 1.14 1 2 1 1 0 4
13 Across-the-University Writing Program 3.83 0.98 2 1 3 0 0 3
14 Alumni Relations 2.83 0.75 0 1 3 2 0 3
15 Athletics 2.50 1.38 0 2 1 1 2 3
16 Career Services 2.50 1.00 0 0 3 0 1 5
17 Computer Services 3.57 0.79 1 2 4 0 0 2
18 Contracts and Grants 2.67 1.37 1 0 2 2 1 3
19 Correspondence Course Division 2.50 0.71 0 0 1 1 0 7
20 Financial Aid 2.60 0.55 0 0 3 2 0 4
21 Food Service 2.60 0.89 0 1 1 3 0 4
22 Health and Kinesiology Center 3.40 1.52 1 2 1 0 1 4
23 Honors Program 3.20 1.10 0 3 0 2 0 4
24 Human Resources 2.71 0.95 0 1 4 1 1 2
25 International Programs 2.67 1.63 1 1 1 1 2 3
26 Library Services 3.71 0.95 1 4 1 1 0 2
27 Lowman Student Center 2.25 0.96 0 0 2 1 1 5
28 Office of Graduate Studies 2.83 1.33 1 0 3 1 1 3
29 Physical Plant 3.00 1.41 0 2 1 0 1 5
30 Post Office 3.33 0.52 0 2 4 0 0 3
31 Public Relations 2.63 0.92 0 1 4 2 1 1
32 Public Safety Services (University Police) 3.17 0.41 0 1 5 0 0 3
33 Purchasing 3.00 0.82 0 1 2 1 0 5
34 Recreational Sports and Activities 3.20 0.84 0 2 2 1 0 4
35 Recruitment 2.67 0.82 0 1 2 3 0 3
36 Registrar's Office 3.40 0.89 0 3 1 1 0 4
37 Research and Sponsored Programs 2.38 1.19 1 0 1 5 1 1
38 Residence Life 3.00 1.00 0 1 1 1 0 6
39 Sam Houston Press 3.67 1.37 1 4 0 0 1 3
40 Student Activities 3.00 0.82 0 1 2 1 0 5
41 Student Life 3.00 0.82 0 1 2 1 0 5
42 Telephone Services 3.25 0.96 0 2 1 1 0 5
43 Undergraduate Admissions 3.00 1.00 0 2 1 2 0 4
44 University Advancement 2.29 0.76 0 0 3 3 1 2
45 University Bookstore 2.50 0.58 0 0 2 2 0 5
46 University Safety Office 3.17 0.75 0 2 3 1 0 3
47 Budget (Operations and Maintenance) 2.00 0.63 0 0 1 4 1 3
48 Funding of Research 2.50 1.22 0 2 0 3 1 3
49 Selection of Administrators 1.83 0.98 0 0 2 1 3 3
50 Selection of Faculty 3.00 1.67 1 2 1 0 2 3
51 Strategic Planning 2.50 1.22 0 1 3 0 2 3
52 Teaching Assignments 2.17 1.17 0 1 1 2 2 3
53 Teaching Overloads 2.00 1.26 0 1 1 1 3 3
For questions 54 through 76 please rate each of the activities using the following scale:
5 = much more than satisfactory           3 = satisfactory                         1 = much less than satisfactory
4 = more than satisfactory                      2 = less than satisfactory        NA = unknown or not applicable 
Evaluate student services in the following areas:
Avg. Std. Dev. 5 4 3 2 1 NA
54 The library meets the needs of my department's curriculum. 3.86 0.69 1 4 2 0 0 2
55 The Student Service Fee allocations are effective in supporting student programs. 2.80 1.64 1 1 0 2 1 4
56 The University Faculty Senate is effective in representing faculty views to the administration. 2.50 1.05 0 1 2 2 1 3
57 The resources available to provide a successful graduate program are adequate. 1.71 0.95 0 0 2 1 4 2
58 The allocation of travel reimbursements meets the needs of the faculty. 2.43 1.51 0 3 0 1 3 2
59 The student instrument to appraising my teaching effectiveness is fair. 2.00 1.15 0 1 1 2 3 2
60 I support online student evaluations of my teaching effectiveness. 2.57 1.51 0 3 1 0 3 2
61 The appraisal of my teaching effectiveness by my chair/coordinator (FES) fairly reflects my teaching performance. 2.43 1.27 0 2 1 2 2 2
62 My salary is appropriate relative to my contribution to SHSU. 2.14 1.68 1 1 0 1 4 2
63 My salary is appropriate relative to my current rank when compared to similar universities. 1.57 1.13 0 1 0 1 5 2
64 The merit system (as stated in the Faculty Handbook) is applied fairly. 2.71 1.60 0 4 0 0 3 2
65 The promotion system (as stated in the Faculty Handbook) is applied fairly. 2.67 1.86 1 2 0 0 3 3
66 The tenure system (as stated in the Faculty Handbook) is applied fairly in my department. 3.17 1.72 1 3 0 0 2 3
67 The performance evaluation (post tenure review) of tenured faculty (as stated in the Faculty Hankbook) is applied fairly in my department. 3.00 1.67 1 2 1 0 2 3
68 Reassigned time is applied fairly in my college. 3.17 1.83 2 1 1 0 2 3
69 The current program of mandatory advisement of students is effective. 2.83 1.17 0 2 2 1 1 3
70 The current program of mandatory advisement of students should be conducted by faculty. 2.29 1.60 1 1 0 2 3 2
71 I support early exams for graduating seniors. 1.86 1.21 0 1 1 1 4 2
72 I support early graduation. 1.86 1.21 0 1 1 1 4 2
73 I support online courses. 3.43 1.13 1 3 1 2 0 2
74 I support online degrees. 2.71 1.60 1 2 0 2 2 2
75 I support continuing participation in the University Center. 4.14 1.07 3 3 0 1 0 2
76 Overall, I am satisfied with my job at SHSU. 3.86 0.90 1 5 0 1 0 2