*SYLLABUS - HIS 575W - RECENT AMERICA, 1876-1933

  Graduate Course Dr. Jeff Littlejohn  
  3 hrs. credit - Fall Term - 2009 Office: AB4 – 455  
  Sam Houston State University Telephone: 936.294.4438   
  http://www.studythepast.com Email: littlejohn@shsu.edu  

 

*COURSE DESCRIPTION

 

Catalog Description: Studies designed to cover social, economic, cultural, diplomatic and political developments of late-nineteenth and 20th century America.

fALL 09: This course will use traumatic events -- such as murders, fires, floods, and wars -- to explore the workings of American society at the turn of the twentieth century. Particular emphasis will be placed on racial, ethnic, and class distinctions that fractured America as the nation moved into a new era of modern corporations and mass culture. In the end, I hope that students will see the selected events as a series of interlocking stories that reveal both the tension and the triumph associated with America's rise to international power.

 

 

*LEARNING OUTCOMES

     
 

1) Students will gain factual knowledge. Students will gain a basic understanding of the periodization and themes in American history from 1876-1932.

2) Students will learn fundamental principles, generalizations, and theories. Students will learn the fundamental principles of historical scholarship as they encounter traditional and recent interpretations of the American past.

3) Students will learn to analyze and critically evaluate ideas, arguments, and points of view. Students will learn to evaluate primary documents and secondary sources as they consider conflicting historical interpretations.

 



*REQUIRED BOOKS

     
 

The Devil in the White City: Murder, Magic, & Madness at the Fair that Changed America
by Erik Larson
ISBN-10: 0375725601

The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America
by Louis Menand
ISBN-10: 0374528497

A Murder in Virginia: Southern Justice on Trial
by Suzanne Lebsock
ISBN-10: 0393326063

Triangle: The Fire that Changed America
by David Von Drehle
ISBN-10: 0871138743

Sacco and Vanzetti: The Men, the Murders, and the Judgment of Mankind
by Bruce Watson
ISBN-10: 014311428X

Arc of Justice: A Saga of Race, Civil Rights, and Murder in the Jazz Age
by Kevin Boyle
ISBN-10: 0805079335

Rising Tide: The Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 and How It Changed America
by John M. Barry
ISBN-10: 0684840022

Optional Reference Book: Rebirth of A Nation: The Making of Modern America, 1877-1920
by Jackson Lears
ISBN-10: 0060747498

In addition to the books listed above, you will be assigned various documents and articles over the course of the semester. These readings should be completed by the date they appear on the syllabus.

 



*COURSEWORK AND GRADING

     
  Your final course grade will be based on the following rubric.

7 Bi-weekly Review Assignments   Every two weeks   50 points each
Online Learning Module Topic Proposal   September 8   25 points
Online Learning Module Research Paper   November 20   50 points
Final Online Learning Module   December 4   75 points
         
Total Points Available       500 points


Grading Scale: A=500-450 B=449-400 C=399-350 D=349-300 F=299-0
 


*ASSIGNMENTS

     
 

Bi-Weekly Review Assignments

After each reading assignment, students will submit a 750-word response statement answering the provided writing prompt. All response statements will be posted on the Blackboard discussion board, where other class members may view them.

Since you will be copying and pasting your bi-weekly review assignments onto the Blackboard discussion board, they MUST BE FORMATTED IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER!

> Your name (top left corner)
> Double Space
> "Review of AUTHOR, TITLE, PUBLICATION HOUSE AND DATE."
> Double Space
> Begin review. The name of the author and title of the book must appear in the first paragraph.
> Use parenthetical citation for the bi-weekly reviews. NO FOOTNOTES OR ENDNOTES.
> Parenthetical citation should look like this (author, page).
> Do not indent paragraphs. Double space between each single-spaced paragraph.


Online Learning Module

Each student in the class will complete their own online learning module. The design process and specific guidelines are posted here. Below you may find the required submission dates.

Topic Proposal

By September 8, each student will submit a 350-word proposal for his/her online learning module. This proposal should include: 1) a title; 2) a brief summary; 3) a list of primary and secondary sources.

Research Paper

By November 20, each students will submit a research paper as a MICROSOFT WORD attachment. This paper will provide the background for your online module.

a) Your paper should be 8 to 12 double-spaced pages in length.
b) Your paper should be based on primary and secondary sources.
c) Your paper should present a clear thesis statement that is supported by relevant facts.
d) Your paper should be well-organized and free of stylistic and grammatical errors.
e) Your paper should contain footnotes formatted in accordance with the Chicago Manual of Style.
f) Your paper should contain a bibliography formatted in accordance with the Chicago Manual of Style.

Final Online Learning Module

By December 4, each student will submit a final online learning module. This module (or website) will present and interpret academic material for the general public. Each of the completed modules in this course should meet the following requirements.

 

 

*ACADEMIC DISHONESTY

     
 

The University expects all students to engage in all academic pursuits in a manner that is above reproach. Students are expected to maintain complete honesty and integrity in the academic experiences both in and out of the classroom.  Any student found guilty of dishonesty in any phase of academic work will be subject to disciplinary action.

5.31 The University and its official representatives, acting in accordance with Subsection 5.32, may initiate disciplinary proceedings against a student accused of any form of academic dishonesty including, but not limited to, cheating, plagiarism, collusion, and the abuse of resource materials.
"Cheating" includes the following and similar actions:
(1) Copying from another student's test paper, laboratory report, other report, or computer files, data listings, and/or programs.
(2) Using, during a test, materials not authorized by the person giving the test.
(3) Collaborating, without authorization, with another student during an examination or in preparing academic work.
(4) Knowingly, and without authorization, using, buying, selling, stealing, transporting, soliciting, copying, or possessing, in whole or in part, the contents of an unadministered test.
(5) Substituting for another student, permitting any other person, or otherwise assisting any other person to substitute for oneself or for another student in the taking of an examination or test or the preparation of academic work to be submitted for academic credit.
(6) Bribing another person to obtain a test or information about an unadministered test.
(7) Purchasing, or otherwise acquiring and submitting as one's own work any research paper or other writing assignment prepared by an individual or firm. This section does not apply to the typing of the rough and/or final versions of an assignment by a professional typist.

5.32 "Plagiarism" means the appropriation and the unacknowledged incorporation of another's work or idea into one's own work offered for credit.
5.33 "Collusion" means unauthorized collaboration with another person in preparing work for credit.
5.34 "Abuse of resource materials" means the mutilation, destruction, concealment, theft or alteration of materials provided to assist students in the mastery of course materials.
5.35 “Academic work” means the preparation of an essay, dissertation, thesis, report, problem, assignment, or other project that the student submits as a course requirement or for a grade.

2.00 PROCEDURES IN CASES OF ALLEGED ACADEMIC DISHONESTY
2.01 Procedures for discipline due to academic dishonesty shall be the same as in disciplinary actions specified in The Texas State University System Rules and Regulations and Sam Houston State University Student Guidelines except that all academic dishonesty actions shall be first considered and reviewed by the faculty member teaching the class. The faculty member may impose failure or reduction of a grade in a test or the course, and/or performing additional academic work not required of other students in the course. If the faculty member believes that additional disciplinary action is necessary, as in the case of flagrant or repeated violations, the case may be referred to the Dean of Student Life or a designated appointee for further action. If the student involved does not accept the decision of the faculty member, the student may appeal to the chair of the appropriate academic department/school, seeking reversal of the faculty member's decision.
2.02 If the student does not accept the decision of the chair of the academic department/school, he/she may appeal to the appropriate academic dean. The chair of the academic department/school may also refer the case directly to the academic dean if the case so warrants. 

 




*INSTRUCTOR EVALUATIONS

     
 

At the end of the semester, students will be asked to complete an evaluation of the course, but we welcome feedback about readings, assignments, and our instruction throughout the semester.  Let’s work together to make this a successful and rewarding learning experience.

 



*CHANGES TO THE SYLLABUS

     
 

This syllabus is your contract for the course. We will not change the nature of the course, the number of assignments, or the grading system. However, we reserve the right to update the course schedule and reading assignments throughout the term.

 



*READING AND ASSIGNMENT SCHEDULE
 


Topic I | The Gilded Age: Chicago, the World's Fair, and a Most Hideous and Infamous Crime


Reading | The Devil in the White City: Murder, Magic, & Madness at the Fair that Changed America
by Erik Larson

Writing Prompt: In his best-selling book, The Devil in the White City, author Erik Larson takes readers on a remarkable journey through Chicago, Illinois, at the end of the nineteenth century. Larson's tale highlights the story of two men -- Daniel Burnham, the brilliant architect who designed the 1893 World's Fair, and Henry H. Holmes, the devious serial killer who preyed on the fair's participants. Through the stories of Burnham and Holmes, Larson explores the contrasts and contradictions of Gilded Age America. What picture of late nineteenth-century America emerges from The Devil in the White City? In your review, please use the biographies of Burnham and Holmes as a vehicle to examine the opulence and degradation of the Gilded Age.

Response Statement due on discussion board by: September 5

 

Online Learning Module Assignment I
Topic Selection posted on Discussion Board by September 8
.

 

Topic II | The Birth of American Pragmatism

Reading | The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America
by Louis Menand

Writing Prompt: In his Pulitzer Prize-winning book, The Metaphysical Club, author Louis Menand examines the origins of American Pragmatism. To tell his story, Menand follows the lives of four key figures, Oliver Wendell Homes, Jr., William James, Charles S. Peirce, and John Dewey. Although these men each had "highly distinctive personalities" and often disagreed with one another, their careers intersected at several important moments, and they came to share a particular "idea about ideas."

Using Holmes, James, and Peirce as the central figures in your review, describe the rise of American Pragmatism. Please be sure to discuss Holmes, James, and Peirce in separate sections of your paper. Give ample biographical details for each man and explain what events led him to form a new "idea about ideas."

Finally, provide a paragraph in which you explain the basic idea at the heart of American Pragmatism. Here, you may find the Preface and pages 351-58 particularly useful.

Response Statement due on discussion board by: September 19 -- Extended to September 21.

 

Topic III | Who Killed Lucy Pollard? Race and Law in the 19th Century South

Reading | A Murder in Virginia: Southern Justice on Trial
by Suzanne Lebsock

Writing Prompt: In her recent book, A Murder in Virginia, Bancroft Prize-winning historian Suzanne Lebsock explores the brutal ax murder of Lucy Pollard, a white farmer’s wife who was killed in rural Virginia in 1895. In Lebsock’s skillful hands, the Pollard murder and resulting series of court cases and investigations become the entre point for a spirited examination of the criminal justice system and race relations in the late nineteenth century American South.  What did Lebsock find out in the course of her research? Who was accused of murdering Lucy Pollard? How were the accused treated? And, what was the final outcome of the case?

Response Statement due on discussion board by: October 3 -- Extended to October 6

 

Topic IV | The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

Reading | Triangle: The Fire that Changed America
by David Von Drehle

Writing Prompt: On March 25, 1911, a match or cigarette ember lit a fire at the Triangle Waist Company in New York City. More than 140 young women were killed in the blaze, which remains one of the worst disasters in American industrial history. In his book, Triangle: The Fire that Changed America, David Von Drehle places the fire in its proper historical context. What is the story he tells, and how did the fire change America?

Response Statement due on discussion board by: October 17

 

Topic V | Immigrants and Radicals: "The good shoemaker and the poor fish peddler"

Reading | Sacco and Vanzetti: The Men, the Murders, and the Judgment of Mankind
by Bruce Watson

Writing Prompt: In 1969, Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas wrote that anyone reading the transcript of the Sacco and Vanzetti case would “have difficulty believing that the trial . . . took place in the United States .” Based on your reading of Bruce Watson's recent book on the case, what did Douglas mean? How does Watson characterize the case and its principal figures?

Response Statement due on discussion board by: October 31-- Extended to November 3

 

Topic VI | Racial Segregation and the Rise of the "New Negro"

Reading | Arc of Justice: A Saga of Race, Civil Rights, and Murder in the Jazz Age
by Kevin Boyle

Writing Prompt: In his fascinating book, Arc of Justice, historian Kevin Boyle examines the infamous Sweet Trials that shook Detroit during the mid-1920s. What does Boyle find? Describe Ossian Sweet and his family. What did they (and their friends) do that was so controversial? And, what important parties played a role in their defense?


Response Statement due on discussion board by: November 14 -- Extended to November 17.

 

Online Learning Module Assignment II

Research Paper posted as a MICROSOFT WORD attachment on Discussion Board by November 20.

 

Topic VII | The Mississippi River Flood of 1927

Reading | Rising Tide: The Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 and How It Changed America
by John M. Barry

Writing Prompt: "At the peak of the great Mississippi River flood of 1993, the river in Iowa carried 435 cubic feet of water a second; at St. Louis, after the Missouri River added its waters, it carried 1 million cubic feet a second. It was enough water to devastate the Midwest and make headlines across the world." By contrast, in 1927, at the time of the River's worst flood in recorded history, the Mississippi carried in excess of three million cubic feet of water each second."

What was the impact of the Mississippi River flood of 1927? Why did it happen? How did it affect the nation's political, economic, and racial patterns?

Response Statement due on discussion board by: November 30

 

Online Learning Module Assignment III

Online learning module posted as a zipped attachment on Discussion Board by December 4.