|
|
% (N) |
% (N) |
Rate |
| Instructor |
|
|
|
| Assistant Professor |
|
|
|
| Associate Professor |
|
|
|
| Professor |
|
|
|
| No Response |
|
|
|
I1.1 Tenure amounts to a lifetime job. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1.00 21 15.1 15.6 15.6 Agree 2.00 36 25.9 26.7 42.2 Neither Agree nor Di 3.00 21 15.1 15.6 57.8 Disagree 4.00 40 28.8 29.6 87.4 Strongly Disagree 5.00 17 12.2 12.6 100.0 No Response 9.00 4 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 135 Missing cases 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I1.2 Tenure is the foundation for academic freedom. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1.00 72 51.8 52.6 52.6 Agree 2.00 41 29.5 29.9 82.5 Neither Agree nor Di 3.00 13 9.4 9.5 92.0 Disagree 4.00 9 6.5 6.6 98.5 Strongly Disagree 5.00 2 1.4 1.5 100.0 Don't Know 8.00 1 .7 Missing No Response 9.00 1 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 137 Missing cases 2 I1.3 Tenure is outmoded and should be replaced w/ long term contracts Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1.00 8 5.8 5.8 5.8 Agree 2.00 13 9.4 9.5 15.3 Neither Agree nor Di 3.00 20 14.4 14.6 29.9 Disagree 4.00 40 28.8 29.2 59.1 Strongly Disagree 5.00 56 40.3 40.9 100.0 No Response 9.00 2 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 137 Missing cases 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I1.4 PTR adds important element to our department’s annual review Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1.00 19 13.7 14.3 14.3 Agree 2.00 31 22.3 23.3 37.6 Neither Agree nor Di 3.00 25 18.0 18.8 56.4 Disagree 4.00 31 22.3 23.3 79.7 Strongly Disagree 5.00 27 19.4 20.3 100.0 Don't Know 8.00 4 2.9 Missing No Response 9.00 2 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 133 Missing cases 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I1.5 Lingering concerns about PTR? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent No 1.00 69 49.6 49.6 49.6 Yes 2.00 70 50.4 50.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 139 Missing cases 0 II2.1 PTR was created due to pressures to increase accountability of university faculty Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1.00 48 34.5 35.6 35.6 Agree 2.00 69 49.6 51.1 86.7 Neither Agree nor Di 3.00 7 5.0 5.2 91.9 Disagree 4.00 4 2.9 3.0 94.8 Strongly Disagree 5.00 7 5.0 5.2 100.0 Don't Know 8.00 2 1.4 Missing No Response 9.00 2 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 135 Missing cases 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - II2.2 PTR developed to “weed out the deadwood.” Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1.00 27 19.4 20.3 20.3 Agree 2.00 52 37.4 39.1 59.4 Neither Agree nor Di 3.00 16 11.5 12.0 71.4 Disagree 4.00 26 18.7 19.5 91.0 Strongly Disagree 5.00 12 8.6 9.0 100.0 Don't Know 8.00 3 2.2 Missing No Response 9.00 3 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 133 Missing cases 6 II2.3 PTR developed due to financial pressures. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1.00 16 11.5 13.1 13.1 Agree 2.00 33 23.7 27.0 40.2 Neither Agree nor Di 3.00 26 18.7 21.3 61.5 Disagree 4.00 36 25.9 29.5 91.0 Strongly Disagree 5.00 11 7.9 9.0 100.0 Don't Know 8.00 12 8.6 Missing No Response 9.00 5 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 122 Missing cases 17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - II2.4 Additional comments re PTR concept Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent No 1.00 87 62.6 62.6 62.6 Yes 2.00 52 37.4 37.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 139 Missing cases 0 III3.1 PTR shoud only be used for folks who fail to perform at minimally aceptable levels during routine annual evaluations. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1.00 39 28.1 29.3 29.3 Agree 2.00 33 23.7 24.8 54.1 Neither Agree nor Di 3.00 8 5.8 6.0 60.2 Disagree 4.00 25 18.0 18.8 78.9 Strongly Disagree 5.00 28 20.1 21.1 100.0 Don't Know 8.00 1 .7 Missing No Response 9.00 5 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 133 Missing cases 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - III3.2 PTR should focus on all activities (teaching, research and service.) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1.00 51 36.7 37.8 37.8 Agree 2.00 58 41.7 43.0 80.7 Neither Agree nor Di 3.00 7 5.0 5.2 85.9 Disagree 4.00 11 7.9 8.1 94.1 Strongly Disagree 5.00 8 5.8 5.9 100.0 No Response 9.00 4 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 135 Missing cases 4 III3.3 PTR should primarily focus on teaching Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1.00 18 12.9 13.6 13.6 Agree 2.00 32 23.0 24.2 37.9 Neither Agree nor Di 3.00 10 7.2 7.6 45.5 Disagree 4.00 39 28.1 29.5 75.0 Strongly Disagree 5.00 33 23.7 25.0 100.0 Don't Know 8.00 1 .7 Missing No Response 9.00 6 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 132 Missing cases 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - III3.4 PTR should primarily focus on research Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1.00 3 2.2 2.3 2.3 Agree 2.00 7 5.0 5.3 7.6 Neither Agree nor Di 3.00 17 12.2 12.9 20.5 Disagree 4.00 55 39.6 41.7 62.1 Strongly Disagree 5.00 50 36.0 37.9 100.0 Don't Know 8.00 1 .7 Missing No Response 9.00 6 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 132 Missing cases 7 III3.5 PTR should primarily focus on service Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1.00 2 1.4 1.5 1.5 Agree 2.00 11 7.9 8.3 9.8 Neither Agree nor Di 3.00 15 10.8 11.4 21.2 Disagree 4.00 52 37.4 39.4 60.6 Strongly Disagree 5.00 52 37.4 39.4 100.0 Don't Know 8.00 1 .7 Missing No Response 9.00 6 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 132 Missing cases 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - III3.6 Additional comments re PTR operation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent No 1.00 91 65.5 65.5 65.5 Yes 2.00 48 34.5 34.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 139 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IV4.1 PTR Stimulates improved teaching Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Benefit 1.00 12 8.6 8.8 8.8 Minor Benefit 2.00 20 14.4 14.6 23.4 No Benefit 3.00 51 36.7 37.2 60.6 Too Soon To Know 4.00 54 38.8 39.4 100.0 No Response 9.00 2 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 137 Missing cases 2 IV4.2 PTR Stimulates improved research Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Benefit 1.00 9 6.5 6.6 6.6 Minor Benefit 2.00 20 14.4 14.7 21.3 No Benefit 3.00 51 36.7 37.5 58.8 Too Soon To Know 4.00 56 40.3 41.2 100.0 No Response 9.00 3 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 136 Missing cases 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IV4.3 PTR Stimulates improved service and outreach Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Benefit 1.00 8 5.8 5.9 5.9 Minor Benefit 2.00 17 12.2 12.5 18.4 No Benefit 3.00 55 39.6 40.4 58.8 Too Soon To Know 4.00 56 40.3 41.2 100.0 No Response 9.00 3 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 136 Missing cases 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IV4.4 PTR Acts as a safeguard to tenure Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Benefit 1.00 10 7.2 7.5 7.5 Minor Benefit 2.00 12 8.6 9.0 16.5 No Benefit 3.00 53 38.1 39.8 56.4 Too Soon To Know 4.00 58 41.7 43.6 100.0 No Response 9.00 6 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 133 Missing cases 6 IV4.5 PTR Increases faculty accountability Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Benefit 1.00 17 12.2 12.6 12.6 Minor Benefit 2.00 37 26.6 27.4 40.0 No Benefit 3.00 37 26.6 27.4 67.4 Too Soon To Know 4.00 44 31.7 32.6 100.0 No Response 9.00 4 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 135 Missing cases 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IV4.6 PTR Helps sustain senior faculty vitality Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Benefit 1.00 13 9.4 9.6 9.6 Minor Benefit 2.00 19 13.7 14.0 23.5 No Benefit 3.00 53 38.1 39.0 62.5 Too Soon To Know 4.00 51 36.7 37.5 100.0 No Response 9.00 3 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 136 Missing cases 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IV4.7 PTR Increases opportunities for mid/late career transition and retirement planning. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Benefit 1.00 4 2.9 3.0 3.0 Minor Benefit 2.00 13 9.4 9.7 12.7 No Benefit 3.00 56 40.3 41.8 54.5 Too Soon To Know 4.00 61 43.9 45.5 100.0 No Response 9.00 5 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 134 Missing cases 5 IV4.8 PTR Establishes development as expectation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Benefit 1.00 25 18.0 18.7 18.7 Minor Benefit 2.00 34 24.5 25.4 44.0 No Benefit 3.00 30 21.6 22.4 66.4 Too Soon To Know 4.00 45 32.4 33.6 100.0 No Response 9.00 5 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 134 Missing cases 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IV4.9 PTR Improves collegiality Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Benefit 1.00 2 1.4 1.5 1.5 Minor Benefit 2.00 9 6.5 6.8 8.3 No Benefit 3.00 77 55.4 58.3 66.7 Too Soon To Know 4.00 44 31.7 33.3 100.0 No Response 9.00 7 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 132 Missing cases 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IV4.10 PTR Increases involvement in dept. planning Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Benefit 1.00 12 8.6 9.0 9.0 Minor Benefit 2.00 19 13.7 14.2 23.1 No Benefit 3.00 57 41.0 42.5 65.7 Too Soon To Know 4.00 46 33.1 34.3 100.0 No Response 9.00 5 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 134 Missing cases 5 IV4.11 PTR Links dept. goals with personal professional plans. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Benefit 1.00 6 4.3 4.5 4.5 Minor Benefit 2.00 21 15.1 15.7 20.1 No Benefit 3.00 60 43.2 44.8 64.9 Too Soon To Know 4.00 47 33.8 35.1 100.0 No Response 9.00 5 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 134 Missing cases 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IV4.12 PTR Focuses attention and rigor on annual review process. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Benefit 1.00 14 10.1 10.5 10.5 Minor Benefit 2.00 23 16.5 17.3 27.8 No Benefit 3.00 54 38.8 40.6 68.4 Too Soon To Know 4.00 42 30.2 31.6 100.0 No Response 9.00 6 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 133 Missing cases 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IV4.13 PTR Increases public confidence in higher education Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Benefit 1.00 19 13.7 14.2 14.2 Minor Benefit 2.00 24 17.3 17.9 32.1 No Benefit 3.00 34 24.5 25.4 57.5 Too Soon To Know 4.00 57 41.0 42.5 100.0 No Response 9.00 5 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 134 Missing cases 5 IV4.14 PTR Forstalls further external review Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Benefit 1.00 15 10.8 11.3 11.3 Minor Benefit 2.00 28 20.1 21.1 32.3 No Benefit 3.00 30 21.6 22.6 54.9 Too Soon To Know 4.00 60 43.2 45.1 100.0 No Response 9.00 6 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 133 Missing cases 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IV4.15 PTR Invasion of professional autonomy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Problem 1.00 23 16.5 17.0 17.0 Minor Problem 2.00 27 19.4 20.0 37.0 No Problem 3.00 62 44.6 45.9 83.0 Too Soon To Know 4.00 23 16.5 17.0 100.0 No Response 9.00 4 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 135 Missing cases 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IV4.16 PTR Process viewed as threat to tenure Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Problem 1.00 34 24.5 24.8 24.8 Minor Problem 2.00 37 26.6 27.0 51.8 No Problem 3.00 41 29.5 29.9 81.8 Too Soon To Know 4.00 25 18.0 18.2 100.0 No Response 9.00 2 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 137 Missing cases 2 IV4.17 PTR will cause Excessive paperwork Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Problem 1.00 43 30.9 31.6 31.6 Minor Problem 2.00 47 33.8 34.6 66.2 No Problem 3.00 28 20.1 20.6 86.8 Too Soon To Know 4.00 18 12.9 13.2 100.0 No Response 9.00 3 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 136 Missing cases 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IV4.18 PTR will take Excessive time Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Problem 1.00 40 28.8 29.6 29.6 Minor Problem 2.00 46 33.1 34.1 63.7 No Problem 3.00 32 23.0 23.7 87.4 Too Soon To Know 4.00 17 12.2 12.6 100.0 No Response 9.00 4 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 135 Missing cases 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IV4.19 PTR will result in an Erosion of collegiality Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Problem 1.00 30 21.6 22.2 22.2 Minor Problem 2.00 30 21.6 22.2 44.4 No Problem 3.00 45 32.4 33.3 77.8 Too Soon To Know 4.00 30 21.6 22.2 100.0 No Response 9.00 4 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 135 Missing cases 4 IV4.20 PTR will have a Negative effect on risk taking and scholarly pursuit of controversial areas of inquiry. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Problem 1.00 26 18.7 19.7 19.7 Minor Problem 2.00 20 14.4 15.2 34.8 No Problem 3.00 47 33.8 35.6 70.5 Too Soon To Know 4.00 39 28.1 29.5 100.0 No Response 9.00 7 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 132 Missing cases 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IV4.21 PTR problems include Unevenness in application of criteria Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Problem 1.00 32 23.0 23.7 23.7 Minor Problem 2.00 17 12.2 12.6 36.3 No Problem 3.00 39 28.1 28.9 65.2 Too Soon To Know 4.00 47 33.8 34.8 100.0 No Response 9.00 4 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 135 Missing cases 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IV4.22 PTR problems include Unreasonable demands on univ. to support faculty improvement plans. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Problem 1.00 15 10.8 11.3 11.3 Minor Problem 2.00 12 8.6 9.0 20.3 No Problem 3.00 52 37.4 39.1 59.4 Too Soon To Know 4.00 54 38.8 40.6 100.0 No Response 9.00 6 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 133 Missing cases 6 IV4.23 PTR will produce No positive change over long term Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Problem 1.00 17 12.2 12.8 12.8 Minor Problem 2.00 10 7.2 7.5 20.3 No Problem 3.00 15 10.8 11.3 31.6 Too Soon To Know 4.00 91 65.5 68.4 100.0 No Response 9.00 6 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 133 Missing cases 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IV4.24 PTR problems include Insufficient development funds Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Problem 1.00 55 39.6 41.4 41.4 Minor Problem 2.00 23 16.5 17.3 58.6 No Problem 3.00 15 10.8 11.3 69.9 Too Soon To Know 4.00 40 28.8 30.1 100.0 No Response 9.00 6 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 133 Missing cases 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IV4.25 PTR problems include Insufficient training Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Problem 1.00 38 27.3 28.1 28.1 Minor Problem 2.00 24 17.3 17.8 45.9 No Problem 3.00 28 20.1 20.7 66.7 Too Soon To Know 4.00 45 32.4 33.3 100.0 No Response 9.00 4 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 135 Missing cases 4 IV4.26 PTR problems include Reduction of professionalism Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Problem 1.00 23 16.5 17.0 17.0 Minor Problem 2.00 20 14.4 14.8 31.9 No Problem 3.00 55 39.6 40.7 72.6 Too Soon To Know 4.00 37 26.6 27.4 100.0 No Response 9.00 4 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 135 Missing cases 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IV4.27 PTR problems include Forcing early retirement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Major Problem 1.00 15 10.8 11.2 11.2 Minor Problem 2.00 13 9.4 9.7 20.9 No Problem 3.00 51 36.7 38.1 59.0 Too Soon To Know 4.00 55 39.6 41.0 100.0 No Response 9.00 5 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 134 Missing cases 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IV4.28 Additional comments re PTR consequences Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent No 1.00 102 73.4 73.4 73.4 Yes 2.00 37 26.6 26.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 139 Missing cases 0 V5.1 Contemplated retirement? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent No 1.00 134 96.4 96.4 96.4 Yes 2.00 5 3.6 3.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 139 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - V5.2 Comtemplated other employment? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent No 1.00 131 94.2 94.2 94.2 Yes 2.00 8 5.8 5.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 139 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - V5.3 Changed professorial habits? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent No 1.00 128 92.1 92.1 92.1 Yes 2.00 11 7.9 7.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 139 Missing cases 0 V5.3.1 Teaching activities Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Not altered 1.00 7 5.0 53.8 53.8 Increased 2.00 4 2.9 30.8 84.6 Decreased 3.00 2 1.4 15.4 100.0 NA/No Response 9.00 126 90.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 126 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - V5.3.2 Research activities Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Not altered 1.00 4 2.9 30.8 30.8 Increased 2.00 7 5.0 53.8 84.6 Decreased 3.00 2 1.4 15.4 100.0 No Response 9.00 126 90.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 126 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - V5.3.3 Service activities Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Not altered 1.00 6 4.3 46.2 46.2 Increased 2.00 4 2.9 30.8 76.9 Decreased 3.00 3 2.2 23.1 100.0 No Response 9.00 126 90.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 126 V5.3.4 Other activites Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Not altered 1.00 7 5.0 63.6 63.6 Increased 2.00 2 1.4 18.2 81.8 Decreased 3.00 2 1.4 18.2 100.0 No Response 9.00 128 92.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 139 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 11 Missing cases 128 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - V5.4 How active in development of PTR standards? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Very active 1.00 48 34.5 34.8 34.8 Moderately active 2.00 36 25.9 26.1 60.9 Passive participant 3.00 23 16.5 16.7 77.5 Did not participate 4.00 31 22.3 22.5 100.0 No Response 9.00 1 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- &n